Harga GasGAS

1. Account Abstraction Haust Wallet is that access. It is a branch of Haust Network that implements the ERC-4337 account abstraction by default. Every user has a smart account with programmable actions, social recovery, custom authentication, and gas sponsorship through

Token and Statistics Ticker: HAUST Max supply: 10B Initial circulation: 2% in the first 2 years = 200M tokens Allocation: Liquidity 20%, Ecosystem 25%, Treasury 30%, Loyalty 10%, Team 15% Use cases: Gas fees, contract deployment, listing fees, veHAUST governance, protocol fees, and oracle connection fees. Network performance: Currently, there are over 10.5M wallets and 50M transactions processed, with over 35K testnet users.

There is a fresh upgrade coming up on @Mantle_Official by Aug. 27, 7 AM UTC, known as the Skadi Mainnet Upgrade. It unlocks so many features, and I am here to share that with you. Skadi is the mainnet upgrade (v1.3.1), mandatory for node operators, and mainly ensures that Mantle fully supports Ethereum’s Prague upgrade, to improve fee estimation, and makes proving state against Ethereum more efficient. ----- 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘂𝗺 𝗣𝗿𝗮𝗴𝘂𝗲 𝗨𝗽𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲? It is an execution-layer upgrade that focuses on making Ethereum faster, safer, and easier to use. Technically, the Skadi Upgrade is adding the following Prague features: • EIP-1153: transient storage • EIP-5656: MCOPY opcode • EIP-6780: SELFDESTRUCT restriction • EIP-7702: SetCode for EOAs • EIP-2935: historical block hashes However, Skadi introduces two important changes: • A new op-node API that helps speed up ZK proof generation. • An update to fee tips so that wallets now see realistic priority fees instead of “zero.” ----- 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗸𝗮𝗱𝗶 𝗨𝗽𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀: 1. Better Wallet UX: Sponsored gas, batching, delegated actions, and recovery via EIP-7702. 2. Cheaper Contracts: Transient storage lowers gas for DEXs, liquidations, and complex flows. 3. Safer Contracts: SELFDESTRUCT is restricted, reducing risks and simplifying upgrades. 4. Stronger Infra: Onchain block hashes improve proofs and light clients, and the new op-node API makes ZK proving faster. 5. Better Fees: Priority fee suggestions will reflect real usage, reducing failed transactions. ----- 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝗲'𝘀 𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸𝗹𝘆 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮: 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗖𝗮𝗻 𝗪𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗽𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲? Statistics: • TVS: ~$2.16B, relatively stable week-over-week. • DA Costs: Minimal, with EigenDA integration continuing to keep posting costs low. • Protocol Revenue: ~$320K for the week, slightly up with rising perps and LST-related activities. • App RCR: Dominated by mETH and derivative projects. • Treasury Runway: Strong, with ~$5.04B assets under management (AUM), ensuring long-term ecosystem growth. • Daily Active Addresses: ~130K average, a marginal increase from last week's data. • Bridge Flows: Net inflows of ~$27M, driven by increased deposits from Ethereum mainnet. What Changes Can We Expect? 1. TVS: ↑ Reason: Easier onboarding due to batching and sponsored gas features, plus cheaper execution, attracting more liquidity. 2. Protocol revenue: ↑ Reason: Lower gas and higher throughput for perps and AMMs could lead to more volume and fees. 3. App concentration (RCR): ↓ concentration, ↑ diversification Reason: Better wallet UX and cheaper contracts make non-DeFi and consumer apps more viable. 4. Daily active addresses (DAU): ↑ Reason: Fewer stuck transactions from accurate tip estimates and smoother flows. 5. Bridge net inflows: ↑ Reason: Stronger confidence from the safety changes with better UX and more user/institution alignment. In conclusion, Skadi keeps Mantle fully aligned with Ethereum’s latest standards, and for developers, this means easier wallet design, cheaper apps, safer contracts, and more reliable infrastructure. For users, it brings lower fees, smoother wallet flows, fewer stuck transactions, safer apps, and access to a wider range of applications. Thanks for reading!

Anything between 3.3M-3.7M on $IoTAI are good bid levels. The @IoTAI_network team is currently working on adding a multi-chain support to their DEX aggregator. The confirmed ones we know are: ‣ @solana ‣ @base ‣ @arbitrum They are also in the process of delivering a sniper tool integrated with their DEX aggregator, making fees across different chains cheaper. I believe that the upcoming sniper feature will be really attractive, as it’s currently saving up to 50% on #ETH gas fees. I’ll be using it myself once its released. NFA/DYOR.

--- LAYER ONE, LAYER TWO & LAYER ZERO Bitcoin and Ethereum are the biggest projects in the history of the crypto market. Each was created to solve a particular problem that people were facing. Bitcoin The major problem Bitcoin (BTC) solves is money control and transfer without intermediaries (like banks or governments). Traditional banking systems usually limit your access to your own funds, add delays, charge high fees, and impose restrictions or taxes. Bitcoin gives people the power to store wealth and send it anywhere in the world without needing permission from any central authority. Ethereum Ethereum came after Bitcoin. While Ethereum can do everything Bitcoin does, it wasn’t created just for that purpose. The main innovation of Ethereum is the introduction of smart contracts which allow developers to build decentralized applications (dApps) on its blockchain. In short, Bitcoin was the first blockchain system but wasn’t designed to host applications. Its focus was mainly on peer-to-peer transactions. Ethereum, however, can do what Bitcoin does and also supports the creation of tokens (ERC-20) and dApps. That’s why we have many coins built on Ethereum. On the other hand, you rarely hear of tokens running natively on Bitcoin’s blockchain (ignoring BRC-20 for simplicity). After Ethereum, more blockchains were created — like XRP, BNB, Cardano, and others — each aiming to solve specific challenges. These are what we call Layer One blockchains. --- 🔹 LAYER ONE The foundation of blockchain networks. They are responsible for recording transactions on-chain. Some Layer Ones also support smart contracts (e.g., Ethereum). Examples: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, BNB Chain, Solana, Avalanche. --- 🔹 LAYER TWO Every blockchain faces what’s called the Blockchain Trilemma, which is the challenge of balancing: 1. Decentralization 2. Security 3. Scalability (speed & low fees). Most blockchains can only achieve two out of three. For example: Ethereum achieves Decentralization + Security, but sacrifices Scalability (transactions are slower and fees are high). To solve this problem, developers build Layer Two solutions on top of Layer One blockchains. These Layer Twos inherit the security of the base blockchain but improve transaction speed and reduce gas fees. Examples: Optimism, Arbitrum, zkSync, Polygon zkEVM. --- 🔹 LAYER ZERO Now, with so many Layer One and Layer Two blockchains existing, another problem emerged: lack of communication between different blockchains. For example: You might have tokens on Ethereum but want to buy something on Polygon. Normally, this is complex and requires bridges. Layer Zero solutions aim to fix this by enabling smooth interoperability between multiple blockchains, so they can communicate and exchange assets easily. Examples: Cosmos, Polkadot, LayerZero protocol. --- SUMMARY (Differences) Layer One → Base foundation blockchains. They record transactions and may support smart contracts. Layer Two → Built on Layer One to fix its weaknesses (e.g., scalability, gas fees). Layer Zero → Enables cross-chain communication and interoperability between different blockchains. --- ✅ That’s the English version of your write-up. Kana so in rubuta maka shi cikin very simple English (ƙaramin ɗan taƙaice) don sabbin shiga crypto su fi fahimta, ko dai wannan cikakken bayani ya isa?