Cult DAOの‌価格CULT

This world is controlled by a dark satanic cult.

While bitcoin staggers under blows of brutal volatility, an enigmatic tweet from Michael Saylor adds fuel to the fire. An AI-generated image, a nod to Matrix, and this cryptic sentence: “Tickets to escape the Matrix are sold in bitcoin.” Is it just a joke? Or a coded message for those who still know how to read between the lines? The timing is no accident. While bitcoin plunges from $106,000 to $103,400 in a few hours—a drop of 2.33%—Saylor, the patriarch of bitcoin faith at MicroStrategy, brandishes a reference to the cult film by the Wachowski brothers. In Matrix, escaping the fake reality involved a phone handset. Today, according to him, bitcoin acts as the gateway. This message arrives in a tense context. In a few days, BTC has lost nearly 5%, and the entire market is holding its breath. Yet, far from giving in to panic, Saylor seems to invite us to look beyond the numbers. The parallel is clear: just as Neo had to choose between the blue pill and the red, investors must decide whether to remain prisoners of the fiat system or embrace bitcoin’s radical freedom. But deep down, this tweet is not just a play of symbols. It is also a demonstration of narrative resilience. Saylor does not deny the fall; he transcends it through storytelling. A controlled, almost hypnotic strategy that keeps the ideological momentum even when the charts turn red. What is striking is Saylor’s ambivalent position. While he shares the libertarian imagery of Matrix, he does not share the visceral hostility towards banks or centralized intermediaries. He proved this when he criticized those who advocate self-sovereignty as the only path. An irony for someone who champions bitcoin as a tool of emancipation. In reality, Saylor is not a purist; he is a strategist. His goal is clear: to accumulate bitcoin on a large scale while maintaining a sufficiently flexible discourse so as not to frighten institutions. He flirts with the codes of the cypherpunks but remains attached to a corporate treasury logic. This hybrid stance allows him to navigate between two worlds: that of idealists and that of pragmatists. And his Matrix tweet, under the guise of philosophical provocation, is perhaps an attempt to reconcile these two universes—or to skillfully manipulate them. While some see hidden messages in Saylor’s GIFs, on-chain data tells another story. According to Santiment, wallets holding more than 10 BTC continue to accumulate. 231 new wallets in ten days. A sign of confidence? Better: an act of faith. The “whales” do not abandon ship. Conversely, modest wallets are abandoning the field: 37,465 of them have liquidated their positions. A silent purge. The hemorrhage of small holders is nothing new but it is revealing: in every bearish phase, Bitcoin transfers wealth from those who doubt to those who believe. Historically, this dichotomy between small sellers and large accumulators often precedes bullish reversals. It is at these moments of apparent despair that the market is reshaped. And Saylor knows it. Hence this not-so-veiled message: stay awake. Bitcoin, with its volatility, its paradoxes, and its prophets, continues to challenge us. By waving the metaphor of Matrix, Saylor does not just troll Twitter. He reminds those who listen that behind the numbers lies a battle of ideas. And those who choose the red pill—or rather bitcoin—must be prepared to weather the storm. Even when the market sways and small investors flee .

In the a16z investment meeting for Cluely, they just asked if everyone would be okay missing out on the next cult of personality founder or if they’d have FOMO if they passed and it blew up Easy yes

Ngl it’s pretty surreal to see these kinds of things happening every day. I remember the days when the future of bitcoin / crypto was not so certain. Days when it really could be “so over” had it not been for a cult of believers and probably some divine intervention 😂

It is all about *generating the illusion of popularity*. Aka: join our cult! everyone's doing it! So -- it is a perfect example of: "network effects vs groupthink", where the latter is (unfortunately) victorious.