Signの‌価格SIGN

Why $TANSSI’s Low Price Could Be Its Biggest Advantage At just $0.075 to $0.08, $TANSSI is catching the attention of savvy traders who understand that low-priced tokens often carry massive upside potential. While some see the price as a sign of being “too early,” experienced investors know this stage can be the most rewarding. The Power of Accessibility A low price makes $TANSSI highly accessible to a wide range of traders. This allows more people to accumulate larger positions without needing huge capital. As adoption grows, demand naturally increases, putting upward pressure on the price. Psychological Impact on Traders There is something powerful about holding a large number of tokens. Traders often prefer accumulating thousands of units of a low-priced token rather than fractions of a more expensive one. This psychological effect can drive a surge of interest and buying activity. Room for Explosive Growth Being at such an early stage, $TANSSI has room to multiply in value. If it moves from $0.08 to just $0.80, that’s already a 10x return. For many traders, this is the kind of opportunity they look for before a token becomes mainstream. Momentum Is Building With rising trading volumes on BITGET and a growing community behind it, $TANSSI’s low price could soon be history. Those who recognize its potential early may benefit the most as momentum builds. This token’s affordability could be its greatest strength—and the key to its breakout success.

Product review: @butterygg conditional funding markets TL;DR: trying their app made me realize just how far we have to go for making usable and understandable products in the futarchy space Overview So prediction markets can be divided into 2 - betting markets like @Polymarket or @Truemarketsorg where you simply wager on the outcome - decision markets like Butter or @seer_pm that predict outcomes on whether you make a product change or give funding vs you dont we've had PMF for (1), while (2) is still nascent with a lot of promise but much fewer active traders in them 1. User Experience why did Butter have their own account separate from the wallet you connect with? After i went through painful bridging to unichain (thanks @layerswap) it took me some time to figure out i need to deposit from there into the butter account? I couldn't clearly see the rationale for having 2 separate accounts, your own wallet and a butter account, esp since i needed to still sign txns when making trades from my own wallet? and even if there is some compelling reason for 2 accounts, I wish i could deposit funds on any chain in my wallet into the butter account which does bridging to unichain on my behalf but making the user first bridge to unichain and then deposit into the custom butter wallet was rather pointless. I would have honestly given up here if i wasn't writing a review on their product (as a side note, its quite ridiculous that i couldn't swap my ETH to USDC using uniswap from within metamask... on unichain??) 2. Comprehensibility I understood little from their tutorial on the implications of my trades So this basically means that if i don't accurately predict whether a project will be funded, i lose all my money? Why should i win or lose money by guessing which project is going to get funding, when i am supposed to guess at their growth in TVL? Ideally if i bet on a project but it doesnt get funded, my capital should simply be returned to me. since what we care about isn't accurately knowing which project will get funding but which will have the highest growth in TVL i didn't realize that @MorphoLabs was already selected as winner and bought some @eulerfinance funded up tokens, guess thats money down the drain 😭 and if i do correctly predict which project gets funding, but am positionally wrong in its up or down value, i again lose money? do i lose all or is there some other formula? why is the current estimate "273M" when i should instead be trying to guess the change in TVL over this period? so i basically need to first see what their current TVL is, calculate the expected change for myself, and then place my bet? why not instead just show the user the expected change in TVL rather than aggregate? I also liked @Lajarre insight from the pilot that traders want to simply place positional bets instead of a specific number of how much up or down their tutorial needs quite a big revamp to appeal to a wider audience, the level of complexity here is beyond users ability to grasp. i consider myself knowledgeable on futarchy and i had a really tough time figuring things out 3. Funding Allocation so from my understanding, they basically measured the difference between "if not funded, then TVL is X" vs if funded, TVL is Y" The difference of Y-X is then used to determine who will make most impact from the funding (this wasn't explained in their tutorial as you can see, i found it from their docs) So essentially to game their system, what you need to do is tell your community to - buy "funded, up token" - buy "not funded down token" and that would yield the highest impact according to their formula, providing the project with $100k without arbitrageours (almost certainly the case in these small pilots with early markets), it becomes a more complex version of quadratic funding where whoever disciplines their community better walks away with more funding this is where the work of @TheGabrielFior at gnosis ai on building agents to trade in such markets is key, as it makes decision markets different from just whoever mobilizes their community better wins Overall, with some improvements to - UX on bridging and swapping between these tokens - changes to the mechanism so even if the event doesnt occur i get my money back instead of losing it, allowing traders to focus on implications of the decision and not whether decision will happen - and onboarding arbitrage bots to trade against projects telling their community to artificially pump their up tokens so they get an allocation we could finally get a credibly neutral funding mechanism that letes degen traders contribute a price discovery function to regen funding allocations

Bitcoin Dominance Signals Potential Altcoin Rally Bitcoin ($BTC) dominance has just shown a bearish crossover—a technical indicator that often signals a shift in market momentum. Interestingly, the last time we saw this same setup was in November, just before altcoins experienced a major surge in prices. If history repeats itself, this could be a sign that another altcoin rally is on the horizon. Traders and investors will be watching closely to see if the pattern holds true again. $BTC $ETH $SOL $SUI $XRP $PI $WCT $BGB

$RCADE 🔍 Key Observations: Current Price: 0.001222 USDT 24h High/Low: 0.001614 / 0.001137 Volume (24h): 1.28B RCADE (~1.69M USDT) Trend: Downward trend from the initial spike Candle Pattern: Mostly red candles with small-bodied candles near the bottom — a sign of bearish pressure weakening Volume SMA (9): 112.617M – Volume is relatively stable, no signs of aggressive buying/selling right now. --- 📉 Technical Analysis (Short-Term) 1. Downtrend with Support Forming After a sharp decline from the initial listing spike, the coin is showing signs of price stabilization between 0.00120 and 0.00125. Support Level: Around 0.00120 – This level has been tested multiple times without being broken significantly, hinting at short-term buyer interest. 2. Resistance Zones First Resistance: 0.00130 – Previous rejection Second Resistance: 0.00140 – Where buyers were overwhelmed 3. Volume Analysis Volume is decreasing, indicating a possible consolidation phase before the next move. If volume increases with green candles, it might signal a reversal or bounce. --- 🔮 Forecast Scenarios ✅ Bullish Scenario (Short-term reversal) If RCADE holds above 0.00120 and breaks above 0.00130, a move toward 0.00145–0.00160 is possible. Watch for a volume spike and a bullish engulfing candle on the 4H chart. ⚠️ Bearish Scenario (Continuation) If price breaks below 0.00120, next potential support lies near 0.00110 or even 0.00100. Low buying interest and declining volume could push it further down. --- 🧠 Conclusion Outlook Trend Strategy Neutral to Slightly Bearish Downtrend slowing down Wait for confirmation before entry. Watch 0.00120 as key support. This coin is still very new (Initial Listing), meaning it’s highly volatile and speculative. You should monitor news, community updates, and exchange volume for better insight.

If you’re looking to BUY/SELL $PUMP at TGE, make sure to avoid [TRANSACTION FAILED] and sign up to TrojanBot now so you’re ready. It’s the fastest and easiest way to trade on SOL whilst avoiding failed transactions when everyone is scrambling to buy/sell. Save on fees too 👇🏼