Syncracy Capital Co-Founder: Unpacking the Ambition and Risks Behind Pump.Fun's Massive Funding

Original Article Title: Pump.Fun's $1 Billion ICO Has Caused Controversy. Can It Succeed?
Original Source: Unchained

Original Article Compilation: lenaxin, ChainCatcher

Editor's Note: This article is a compilation based on a video interview with Ryan Watkins, co-founder of Syncracy Capital, by Unchained. It analyzes Pump.Fun's revenue model, valuation logic, systemic risks, and potential transformation path. On June 3rd, according to @NextFuckingThing, "Pump.Fun plans to raise $1 billion through an ICO at a fully diluted valuation of $40 billion, or will airdrop 10% of the tokens to the community." This news has sparked strong community reactions, with trader Ansem likening it to "the second plane hitting the Twin Towers." A poll initiated showed that 70% of participants believe Pump.Fun has a negative impact on the crypto industry. ChainCatcher has compiled and translated the content.

Key Insights

· Without disclosing the destination of the funds, Pump.Fun is both generating profits and raising another $1 billion, severely eroding user trust.

· Nearly half of the trading volume is controlled by bots and third parties, leading Pump.Fun to gradually lose control of its own ecosystem.

· What truly retains users is not airdrops, but the product itself.

· The value of a token relies not on fundraising gimmicks, but on a clear purpose and execution.

(1) Why Pump.Fun Earned $700 Million Yet Finds Itself on the Brink of Trust Collapse

Laura Shin: I'd like to ask for your opinion on the event and how you assess this market reaction.

Ryan Watkins: Over the past two years, meme coins have always been the most controversial asset class in the crypto space, with Pump.Fun becoming a typical representative of this controversy. Since its launch in Q1 2024, the platform has accumulated $700 million in revenue, making it one of the most profitable projects in the crypto economy, thanks to a 1% transaction fee and a bonding curve mechanism.

However, this business success is accompanied by many issues: retail investor losses are becoming increasingly severe, mainly due to systemic risks such as market manipulation bots and insider trading; what was once a simple community culture has morphed into a complex "meme coin industry chain"; more notably, the platform, without a clear purpose for the funds, has initiated a $1 billion fundraising effort targeting the losing user base.

From a business value perspective, although its profit model is controversial, its financial performance is solid; in the current market environment, if the meme coin trend continues, its valuation remains reasonable; fundamentally, the project offers an investment opportunity in "platform equity," a characteristic that precisely explains the dual nature of its controversy and value.

Laura Shin: Can Pump.Fun still be trusted?

Ryan Watkins: If Pump.Fun's $1 billion ICO is successful, it will be the third largest fundraising in crypto history, behind only EOS's $4.2 billion and Telegram's $1.7 billion. A meme coin platform raising a single financing round comparable to industry giants like Circle is a phenomenon worthy of in-depth exploration.

Although its newly launched AMM protocol has an annualized revenue of $52 million, it is still insignificant compared to the platform's total revenue of $700 million. More crucially, in the absence of significant product breakthroughs, the platform has neither disclosed specific funding purposes nor responded to industry figures like Vanna Charmer's doubts about capital efficiency.

From a development strategy perspective, signing high-profile content creators to lucrative contracts may be the most direct breakthrough, following the examples of top creators like Aiden Ross who often secure contracts worth tens of millions of dollars. Looking further ahead, developing a public chain, establishing a trading platform, or issuing stablecoins are all possible directions in the matured business models of the crypto field. However, the core issue lies in the fact that when the platform is still dominated by bot-driven trading, any ecosystem layout is unlikely to address the fundamental trust crisis. For Pump.Fun, rebuilding community consensus is far more important than pursuing fundraising scale.

(2) Pump.Fun's High-Stakes Gamble: Ambition and Concerns Behind the $1 Billion Fundraising

Laura Shin: If the ICO is successful, what do you think would be the best course of action?

Ryan Watkins: If I were to lead the use of this fund, my top priority would be to assemble a top-notch social media product team. I would focus on recruiting talent with an artificial intelligence background from platforms like TikTok, Meta, and others to revamp the current chaotic content discovery mechanism. The current information flow experience of Pump.Fun does have obvious flaws, as users often get stuck in meaningless browsing loops.

Secondly, a significant amount would be invested to onboard top content creators, including native crypto influencers and top anchors from traditional domains. Although the signing costs are high, this is a necessary step for quickly establishing a content ecosystem. At the product level, collaboration with innovative protocols such as Hyperliquid could be considered, leveraging its HIP-3 revenue-sharing mechanism to develop a perpetual contract market for meme coins; of course, with the current funding strength, building a trading platform independently is also entirely feasible.

However, the most crucial aspect is still to clearly define the use of funds. Introducing a large-scale token buyback plan to directly enhance token value capture capability might be the most community-recognized solution. After all, in the absence of a clear roadmap, any grand vision is difficult to gain user trust.

Laura Shin: Does Pump.Fun truly need such a substantial amount of funding for transformation?

Ryan Watkins: Pump.Fun can definitely break through the limitations of meme coins and transition to a broader asset issuance platform. As the leading issuance platform currently occupying 95% market share, its advantages are obvious: ample funding reserves, one of the most popular front-ends in the Solana ecosystem, and a continuously growing mobile user base.

The direction of transformation could focus on building a universal capital market infrastructure:

· Expand asset categories, introduce new types of assets such as Internet capital market tokens

· Establish a strict asset screening mechanism, distinct from the current disorderly state

· Develop supporting functions such as founder lock-up periods, compliant fundraising tools, etc.

This transformation touches on the fundamental contradiction in the crypto field: How to set reasonable boundaries in a permissionless system? The current situation of Pump.Fun has sparked a profound discussion about "what should be built on the blockchain"—whether to continue supporting purely speculative tools or to shift towards creating a platform that offers real value. There is no standard answer to this question, but it is indeed a subject that the entire ecosystem must confront.

Laura Shin: Considering the current downturn in revenue, what was the strategic consideration for Pump.Fun to launch its ICO at this time?

Ryan Watkins: From an investment perspective analyzing Pump.Fun's ICO valuation issue, the pricing logic of a $4 billion valuation corresponding to an 8x price-to-sales ratio is debatable. Although the platform's recent performance with $45 million in the past 30 days ($500 million annualized) may seem to support this valuation, the idiosyncratic nature of the meme coin market introduces a fundamental flaw in this linear extrapolation.

The Trump meme coin case proves that such assets' trading volume is highly reliant on incidental celebrity effects, and the market evidently struggles to sustainably create more impactful events. Even if the current trading volume remains relatively high, the sustainability of this growth trajectory is questionable. The deeper issue lies in the platform's failure to demonstrate the ability to break free from the cyclical nature of meme coins. The implied growth expectations of an 8x price-to-sales ratio may have already excessively priced in future potential if Pump.Fun cannot build a growth engine beyond celebrity coin launches, its current valuation may face a severe test.

Laura Shin: Does the early liquidity clause under Pump.Fun's current $4 billion valuation conceal risks?

Ryan Watkins: From the essence of the ICO, this fully liquid design is not surprising—the tokens can freely trade once listed. As long as all investors participate at a uniform valuation, this lock-up-free clause itself does not pose a problem.

(III) Can Pump.Fun Cement Solana's Reputation Instead of Orchestrating Another Airdrop Game?

Laura Shin: How can Solana strike a strategic balance between maintaining the traffic dividend from memes and shedding the stigmatization of being a "speculative public blockchain"?

Ryan Watkins: The market has valid doubts about Pump.Fun's $1 billion ICO, especially since the platform has already made $700 million in profits yet still seeks extensive funding. In the short term, this may trigger capital diversion, leading to selling pressure on Solana and related assets. However, in the long run, a successful fundraising effort will elevate Solana's position as a mainstream fundraising platform, attracting more high-quality projects and altering the current meme coin-dominated ecosystem. This benchmark case can also lower the psychological threshold in the market for ICO sizes, stimulating more compliant fundraising activities.

The key lies in whether Pump.Fun can use the funds for substantive innovation rather than continue financial games, which will determine whether this ICO is ultimately an opportunity for ecosystem upgrade or another round of capital extraction.

Laura Shin: What considerations are behind Pump.Fun's funding strategy, which focuses on ICOs as the main approach and airdrops as a supplementary tactic?

Ryan Watkins: Most airdrop projects have not brought substantive value to the product but have instead distributed free funds to users who are not truly interested in the product — these people often sell off immediately after receiving the airdrop. Hyperliquid became a rare successful case not because users held onto the airdropped tokens for a long time (in fact, most people still chose to sell), but because it has strong intrinsic product value and a sustainable revenue model. The airdrop here serves merely as a display of community consensus and aligns with the decentralized ideology. The key insight is:

· Airdrops should be implemented after the product is mature and must give users sufficient reasons to hold the tokens

· For the Solana ecosystem, airdrops may compensate some meme coin traders for their losses and reignite market enthusiasm

· However, fundamentally, airdrops are just icing on the cake; the product's intrinsic value is the determining factor

Blindly imitating the airdrop model will only result in resource waste; project teams should focus more on building a product foundation with real demand.

4. From Trading Platform to Super App? Pump.Fun's Breakthrough and Watershed Moment

Laura Shin: How does Pump.Fun maintain its leading position in the increasingly fierce competition?

Ryan Watkins: Pump.Fun is facing a core challenge: nearly half of the trading volume is already controlled by third-party interfaces and bots, causing the platform to gradually lose its position as the entry point for asset distribution. This trend will continue to weaken its dominance in the ecosystem, as large third parties can easily self-build issuance platforms (as demonstrated in the Radium case), diverting users and liquidity. Although it currently maintains its position through liquidity advantages, in the long run, it must enhance user stickiness to consolidate its competitiveness. Its response strategy focuses on two directions:

1. Social Transformation: By building a social graph to create emotional stickiness, users are retained based on social relationships rather than just transactional needs (in line with Chris Dixon's law of "tools attract users, network effects retain users")

2. Feature Generalization: Transforming competitors' innovations into one's own feature set, evolving from a single meme platform to a comprehensive entry point

Fundamentally, Pump.Fun needs to complete the transition from a "trading venue" to a "social + financial super app" before the liquidity advantage diminishes, otherwise ecosystem cannibalization by third parties is only a matter of time. Failed cases like Radium demonstrate that pure technical replication is unlikely to displace market leaders, but ecosystem restructuring based on social relationships could potentially change the game.

Laura Shin: Do you have any other thoughts or suggestions regarding Pump.Fun?

Ryan Watkins: This industry always experiences controversial yet exciting turning points from time to time. Can Pump.Fun successfully raise $1 billion? How will the market digest this news? What is the specific use of the funds? Regardless of the ultimate outcome, as one of the most well-funded products in the crypto space with one of the broadest user bases, every move by Pump.Fun could have a profound impact on Solana and the entire industry ecosystem. This is destined to be a landmark event worth close attention.

Disclaimer

The content of this article does not represent ChainCatcher's views. The opinions, data, and conclusions in this article represent the personal positions of the original authors or interviewees, and the translator maintains a neutral position and does not endorse their accuracy. It does not constitute advice or guidance in any professional field, and readers should use it judiciously based on independent judgment. This translation is solely for the purpose of knowledge sharing. Readers are advised to strictly comply with local laws and regulations and refrain from engaging in any illegal financial activities.

Original Article Link