Cena Distributed Autonomous OrganizationDAO

RT @wassielawyer: Some thoughts on the Jupiter DAO pause. The Jupiter DAO is a pretty ambitious experiment by @weremeow and team and this…

Some thoughts on the Jupiter DAO pause. The Jupiter DAO is a pretty ambitious experiment by @weremeow and team and this reset towards a new governance system is undoubtedly a step in the right direction. The previous DAO system gave real power to the people but the framework

5/ ▪️5.45% - DAO Treasury: Community-driven initiatives, proposals & upgrades. ▪️4.45% - Strategic Reserve: Future opportunities, powerful partnerships. ▪️2.95% - Pre-sale Investors: Early adopters who believed. ▪️2.95% - Seed Investors: The pioneers who laid the foundation. 🔍A

$LOT Price by 2030? High trader activity: LOT becomes the go-to platform for gamified trading. Utility growth: Beyond competitions — real DeFi utility, NFT/DAO governance, staking power. Scarcity factors: Token burns, long-term locks, DAO-controlled emissions. ⚠️ Risks to Long-Term Price Growth Competitor tokens may outperform or dominate trader communities. Low retention of users post-competition hype. Token inflation if emissions are mismanaged. Regulatory pushback on copy trading or performance fees. 🧮 Historical Analogs Token Launch Price 5-Year Growth Notes $DYDX ~$2 (2021) ~$3.5 (2024–25) Decentralized trading governance token $GMT (STEPN) ~$0.01 ~$0.90 (2022 peak) Gamified token with short hype cycle $SAND ~$0.05 ~$6.5 (2021) High growth during boom These tokens saw explosive growth only when the utility met a narrative + hype cycle. 📌 Summary A realistic 2030 price range for LOT depends on utility, adoption, and emissions: Conservative target: $0.30–$0.50 Optimistic (if major success): $1.50–$2.50+ Worst-case survival mode: $0.03–$0.06

About Governance Proposals for $BOMB : Shaping the Future of a Deflationary Power Token 🗳️🔥🧠 As $BOMB evolves from a simple deflationary meme into a utility-rich, community-driven token, governance proposals become the cornerstone of its decentralized decision-making model. In a system where supply is always shrinking, every token becomes increasingly valuable—not just in price, but in voting power. Governance gives holders the ability to influence protocol upgrades, ecosystem decisions, and economic parameters that shape the future of $BOMB . Let’s explore what $BOMB governance proposals are, how they work, and why they matter. --- 🗳️ What Are Governance Proposals? Governance proposals are formal suggestions submitted by token holders to enact changes in the $BOMB protocol or Bombie ecosystem. These proposals are voted on by the community, usually weighted by token ownership, giving more influence to larger (but still deflation-exposed) holders. --- ⚙️ How Governance Works in $BOMB ✅ 1. Proposal Submission Any eligible token holder (usually holding a minimum threshold of $BOMB ) can submit a proposal. Proposals may require a bonded deposit to prevent spam. Typical Proposal Types Include: 🔥 Adjusting burn parameters (e.g., increasing burn rate or creating halving events) 🪙 Treasury allocations for marketing, development, or staking rewards 🛠️ Integration with DeFi tools or DEXs 🎮 Game or NFT ecosystem upgrades 🗂️ Adjustments to staking, governance weights, or DAO structure --- ✅ 2. Proposal Review / Community Debate Once posted, proposals enter a discussion phase, often on governance forums or Discord. Feedback is gathered, adjustments made, and community consensus begins to form. 📌 This period is critical for avoiding rushed or unpopular decisions. --- ✅ 3. Voting Period Proposals are voted on through a smart contract or DAO interface. Voting power = Number of $BOMB tokens held (or staked) at the time of the snapshot. Some systems offer quadratic voting or delegated voting to enhance fairness. Outcomes: Approved proposals move to implementation. Rejected proposals may be revised and resubmitted later. --- ✅ 4. Execution & Transparency Successful proposals are executed on-chain, creating full transparency. Burn rates, fund transfers, or protocol changes happen automatically via smart contracts when possible. This ensures trustless governance, where code, not promises, enforces community decisions. --- 🔍 Why Governance Matters More in a Deflationary Model In $BOMB 's case, every transaction reduces supply, meaning: Fewer tokens = More concentrated voting power Long-term holders become increasingly powerful stakeholders Governance isn’t just democratic—it’s weighted by commitment As time progresses, the cost of governance rises, making early decisions and votes disproportionately important. That’s why participating in governance now matters more than ever. --- 🧠 Strategic Implications for Token Holders Active voters can shape burn logic, rewards, or utility development. Influencers or large holders can direct ecosystem priorities. Delegation models allow passive holders to empower trusted participants. 🧩 Long-term, $BOMB governance proposals may dictate: 🔁 How liquidity is incentivized 💎 What projects the treasury supports 🪙 Whether deflation is accelerated or optimized --- ✅ Final Insight: Governance proposals for $BOMB aren't just bureaucratic paperwork—they're the blueprints of the token’s future. In a world where supply fades daily, the value of a vote grows exponentially. By participating in governance today, holders don’t just preserve value—they create it. 💣 Don’t just hold $BOMB . Help shape what it becomes.