Ціна Aave TokenAAVE

✦🔥 “BTC Dominance Cracks 50 EMA — Is Altseason 2025 Already Loading?” 💭 ✍️ By ProfUseey | Voice of the Underdogs 🌍 ━━ 💭 The Hook — “When Bitcoin’s Throne Shakes, Alts Awaken. But This Time, It’s Different.” ━━ The market just flipped the switch. November 12’s correction wiped out $520M+ in liquidations — BTC down −2.83% ($103K), ETH −4.16% ($3.4K), SOL −7.99% ($156). Fear Index: 21 (Extreme). Group chats: chaos. Charts: bleeding red. Yet beneath the panic lies a pattern — BTC dominance just fell below its 50 EMA (now 59.65%), echoing the same setup that triggered the 2021 Altseason Explosion. Back then, alts went 10–100x. Now, institutions are entering the same zone — with SOL ETFs clocking 12 straight green days (+$369M inflows). So… is this 2021’s madness repeating — or is 2025 scripting something bigger, smarter, and built to last? ⚡ ⭕ ProfUseey Data Zone — Dominance Break: The Shift in Motion 📊 Nov 12 Correction Snapshot (24h Pulse) BTC: $103K (−2.83%) | RSI 48 | Testing $101K | Dominance <50 EMA ETH: $3.4K (−4.16%) | L2 TVL +41% Q3 SOL: $156 (−7.99%) | ETFs +$369M inflows (12-day streak) Total Cap: $3.47T (−2.82%) Fear & Greed: 21 — historically, a buy zone. 🧩 2021 vs 2025 — What’s Changed? Year Market Nature Key Driver 2021 Retail FOMO, wild rallies, chaos Meme hype 2025 Institutional inflows, RWAs, ETFs Structured growth This isn’t just another cycle — it’s a controlled revolution. ⭕ Sector Spotlight — The New Engines of Altseason 🔥 Sector Key Momentum 2025 Twist Outlook ETFs SOL ETF +$369M inflows Institutions fueling structure Bullish — SOL $210+ RWA $13.9B TVL → $50B EOY Tokenized bonds entering TradFi ONDO / CHR to $1+ L2s $41B TVL (+41% Q3) Interop bridges + AI scaling ARB / AVAX +50% Gaming $1.2B TVL (+150% YTD) Real utility, not Ponzi IMX +40% DeFi $170B TVL (+174% DEX vol) RWA-backed lending UNI / AAVE +25% 🧠 Street Wisdom BTC dominance under 50 EMA doesn’t just mean “altseason” — it signals capital rotation, not chaos. Whales just added $1.15B in longs (64% leverage) — expecting a bounce, not breakdown ⭕ ProfUseey Reality Zone — The Psychology of Corrections 🧘‍♂️ That −7.99% SOL candle isn’t punishment — it’s a purge. Markets don’t break traders — they filter them. When fear hits 21, legends are built quietly. October’s $19B red week birthed November’s +42% recovery. 👉 This isn’t the end — it’s a test. Don’t trade emotions. Trade the evidence. ⭕ ProfUseey Playbook — Turning Dips Into Dynasties 📈 ✅ Core (50%) — BTC / ETH (Anchor) ✅ Growth (30%) — SOL / ICP / SUI (ETF & AI momentum) ✅ Lotto (20%) — DOGE / XRP / BNB (Volatility plays) 🎯 Entry Plan: If BTC dominance retests 58% and fails → Altseason Confirmed. DCA when Fear Index <25. Journal every move — turn “rekt” into “reset.” “Corrections don’t crush discipline — they create it.” — ProfUseey ❤️ The Underdog Mindset A few months ago, a small trader in Abuja bought SOL at $145 — people laughed. After the correction, SOL dipped… then flipped — turning $200 into $215. That’s not luck — that’s conviction. 2025 isn’t about chasing hype; it’s about positioning before recognition. You can’t time the storm, but you can prepare the sails. ⛵ ⭕ Street Debate — Let’s Talk Real Market Logic 👇 💭 Is this the 2021 Altseason Reload or 2025’s Smart Capital Rotation? 💭 SOL ETF inflows vs BTC dominance — which tells the real story? 💭 What’s your biggest conviction play this November: AI, RWA, or L2s? Drop your take below — no hype, just truth and data. Because ProfUseey posts aren’t about clicks — they’re about clarity. 💡 ❤️ Final Note — For the Flippers, Not the Followers Markets don’t reward emotions. They reward preparation, patience, and data. BTC’s throne is shaking — and altcoins are sharpening their swords. Whether this becomes another 2021 mania or a 2025 masterpiece depends on one thing: how you manage the correction. ❤️ Like if you’re stacking through the fear. 🔁 Share if you believe altseason isn’t coming — it’s already building. 👥 Follow @ProfUseey — where underdogs decode dips into dominance. “The market doesn’t punish the weak — it trains the wise.” — ProfUseey 💭 #BTCDominance #ProfUseey #BitgetInsight$SOL $XRP $ICP

$#Aave Price Prediction: $246 Target Within 2 Weeks as Technical Indicators Signal Bullish Momentum AAVE price prediction shows potential rally to $246 in the short term, with medium-term $#Aave forecast targeting $340-$370 range based on technical analysis.

Dear @SiloFinance team, Thank you for the detailed response. I appreciate the clarifications on protocol design and legal actions taken. However, several critical concerns remain unaddressed: 1️⃣ DAO Governance vs. Unilateral Decisions You state that Silo operates as a DAO where SILO token holders have voting power over treasury management and protocol decisions . Yet, the decision that "the DAO will not compensate lenders" (Point 7) appears to have been made unilaterally without community vote. On behalf of the community, I request: Formal DAO proposal on @SnapshotLabs presenting multiple options: – Option A: No compensation (current stance) – Option B: Partial treasury-funded compensation (e.g., 25-50% haircut) – Option C: SILO token dilution to create compensation fund – Option D: Revenue-sharing from future protocol fees until affected users are made whole Let SILO token holders decide through governance, not the core team. 2️⃣ Reputation Damage ≠ Legal Liability While I understand Silo's legal position, users will associate the Silo brand with this $60M loss regardless of ToS disclaimers. This is already evident: • TVL down 22% in 5 days ($143.7M → $111.7M) • Affected users will never return without resolution • New users will choose competitors (Aave, Morpho, Compound) with clean track records • Every DeFi community discussion about Silo will mention "the $60M incident" The question isn't "Are we legally liable?" It's "Can Silo survive reputationally without proactive action?" 3️⃣ Weekly Legal Updates You mention legal proceedings have been initiated, and it's very much appreciated. Transparency requires regular updates: • Weekly or bi-weekly public updates on: • Legal proceedings status (filings, responses, court dates) • Negotiations with Stream Finance/Stable Labs • Recovery timeline estimates • Any settlements or repayments received 4️⃣ UI Transparency Hiding affected markets while promoting new vaults creates perception of cover-up, regardless of intent. I strongly advise to: – Restore UI visibility with clear red warning banners: "⚠️ This market is affected by the Stream Finance incident. Withdrawals are currently frozen. [Learn more]" – Dedicated status page showing exact frozen amounts per market, recovery progress, legal action updates 5️⃣ The Permissionless Protocol Paradox You correctly note that Silo's markets are permissionless and immutable. However: • Uniswap doesn't promote specific pools. Users create them independently • Silo actively promoted Managed Vaults through official channels • This creates implied endorsement, even if legally disclaimed If Silo wants to maintain "neutral infrastructure" positioning, it must: • Stop promoting specific vaults/markets • Implement risk ratings (A/B/C/D) for all markets • Require independent audits for any vault featured on official UI *** The DeFi community values protocols that acknowledge mistakes and let governance decide on solutions. Hiding behind terms of service while promoting new products will permanently damage trust. This is your chance to either build a strong community by proactively seeking ways to compensate users or risk destroying your reputation entirely. Assisting affected users will provide long-term value, even if your compensation covers only a fraction of the loss - such as through vested or staked tokens, for example. PS: Appreciate that you reply to my messages publicly, this is a green flag for the entire community.

$AAVE analysis: Price is in a downtrend channel and was rejected from the downtrend line. It needs to hold the local support area; a break below $205 is bearish. It's better to wait for a break of the channel for new entries.