Ethereum Name Service 價格ENS

RT @punk3690: Minted my first ENS in 2017; before CryptoPunks even existed. Alongside Bitcoin, it’s my longest and strongest conviction pl…

I still think they would make a killing if they did an ENS style market for Twitter Handles and hosted that marketplace themselves Dormant usernames get a new life, the blackmarket gets BTFO and they get all of that revenue

We love ENS

RT @ENS_DAO: Another week, another chance to shape ENS. Preview the weekly working group agenda and join the conversation. Let’s build toge…

ive been thinking recently on the difference between being EVM aligned vs Ethereum aligned why does the distinction matter? if we want the ecosystem to solve its public goods challenge, projects should pay for the software that THEY depend on > Asking an alt L1 like Avalanche to pay for ethereum centered goods like clients is a non starter but would they give money to the solidity team? Maybe, since they are evm equivalent & AVAX app developers use solidity for their smart contracts > what is the value of side chains like Polygon that use their own validators (but still settle on Ethereum) vs inherit ETH security directly like an L2? (i) UI value: ethereum wallets can access their apps, and (ii) option value: if an app decides the chain is not for them, it's much easier to switch to another L2 or ETH L1 than to solana so expanding EVM network effects is good for Ethereum, but its not inevitable that ethereum wins if EVM wins > Unlike sidechains, L2 rollups directly use ETH validators for security and consume blockspace a common worry is rollups becoming big and bootstrapping their own validator network to reduce reliance on ethereum i think such worries are overblown as unbundling is the trend (like cloud) and most L2s are more focused on use cases than having their own security even if it happens, its hard for them to escape the EVM which still bring the benefits (i) and (ii) > Apps and DAOs with an onchain treasury have a lot more stickiness one of Ethereums biggest strengths is emerging from the wealth effect when ETH went up in 2021 with foundational projects like Gnosis, ENS, Kleros and Golem with decades of runway to achieve their goal along with newer ones like Arbitrum, Aave, Uniswap, Lido that have PMF and strong revenue streams If we contrast with solana which had their wealth effect more recently, ethereum has more foundational projects, are more onchain and also apply to broader use cases > finally we have the EL/CL clients & validators that make ethereum function and produce blocks they rise and fall with ethereums ship but lack a connection with other parts of the ethereumverse that can assure their longevity there is a win-win way to connect these threads, from the alt EVM L1s to the core ethereum clients. We just gotta figure out how