Inter Milan Fan Token 價格INTER

6/ Trust requires proof of credibility & it’s earned through formal institutional validation. @RaylsLabs has many notable establishments: 🔸Official partnership with Central Bank of Brazil 🔸 Brazil Santander, Nuclea (Inter-clearing house) 🔸 Selected for MasterCard's Start Path Program 🔸Recognised by @jpmorgan as best-in-class infra for TradFi–blockchain convergence This real adoption fuels credibility where it compounds institutional confidence to set the stage for more entities to onboard.

Sweden’s Justice Minister has reportedly ordered law enforcement to ramp up seizures of unexplained crypto holdings—even without direct evidence of a crime. The directive hinges on a controversial law that could redefine asset forfeiture in the digital age. On July 4, Decrypt reported that Sweden’s Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer issued a formal call for law enforcement, tax authorities, and the national Enforcement Authority to intensify confiscations of crypto assets suspected of being tied to illicit activity. The directive is based on a law passed last November that grants authorities sweeping powers to seize digital assets, even without definitive proof of criminal conduct, if the owners cannot adequately explain their origins. Since its introduction, the law has already been used to seize $8.4 million in property, marking one of Europe’s most aggressive stances on unexplained wealth. According to the report, Strömmer emphasized the importance of improving inter-agency coordination, particularly when dealing with high-value assets like cryptocurrency, stating it was “time to turn up the pressure.” Justice Minister Strömmer’s push appears to stem from mounting concern over digital assets’ role in Sweden’s organized crime economy. A September 2024 report from Sweden’s Police Authority and Financial Intelligence Unit found that some cryptocurrency exchanges function as de facto money laundering services—facilitating the flow of drug money, fraud proceeds, and other criminal revenue. The report explicitly urged law enforcement to “increase its presence” on crypto trading platforms to help identify and dismantle such operations. Meanwhile, recent figures from the Bloomsbury Intelligence & Security Institute estimate that roughly 62,000 individuals were involved in or linked to criminal networks in Sweden as of 2024. While data on crypto-specific crime remains sparse, authorities cite the anonymity and cross-border capabilities of digital assets as key enablers of organized crime. These concerns likely fueled Strömmer’s argument that Sweden’s asset forfeiture laws must evolve to match the realities of financial crime in the digital era. One of the most vocal supporters of Strömmer’s crackdown is Sweden Democrat Dennis Dioukarev, a prominent advocate for a national Bitcoin reserve. Dioukarev argues that seized crypto, particularly Bitcoin ( BTC ), should be transferred to Sweden’s central bank, the Riksbank, to build a strategic reserve. “Cryptocurrencies confiscated from criminals should be repurposed to strengthen Sweden’s financial position,” Dioukarev said in the report, framing the move as a way to turn crime-fighting into a long-term economic asset. Still, the government’s silence on what will actually happen to confiscated crypto has raised questions. When pressed, Strömmer’s office declined to clarify whether seized assets would be liquidated, held, or directed into a national reserve.

ETHCC Cannes Takeaways (Web3 AI-oriented) - AI x Web3 builders are prioritizing usable products over flexing infra. It's less about "we got cool complex infra for building agents" to “how do we get actual users and revenue?” - Core design discussions now center around how to keep data confidential, what to share with AI agents, and how to make AI actions auditable/verifiable using systems like TEE, zkTLS, zkML & opML. - Top teams are designing intelligent agent systems where LLMs make decisions, smart contracts execute, and verifiable systems enable trust (AI Tokenized Vault + zkML/opML) - The next gen of AI launchpads are building ecosystems around actual use cases first, then token later (multiple projects building App Store for agents instead of just another launchpad) - AI agent teams are moving toward niche, domain-specific use cases—LP optimizers, mod recruiters, Marketing/PR agents, Alpha curators, BPA for Web3-specific workflows. - Tools are being built to support agent monetization, agent-to-agent communication, attribution, evaluation, and inter-agent referrals, forming a foundation for long-term sustainability and interoperability. - StableAI ➔ adoption of AI agents/systems to improve stablecoin yields + adoption of stablecoin in volatile AI ecosystems remains a blue ocean with only a few teams tackling the market. - AI is everywhere but highly differentiated—teams are starting to apply it beyond simple conversational bot on X, they apply it directly to the product, or use it to enhance user acquisition & user retention. Web2 AI and Web3 AI are converging. We're seeing lead-gen, customer support, BPA workflow enhancements being implemented in Web3, improving teams internal processes. Web3-native use cases (DeFAI, trading, prediction, personality & entertainment, analytics/information) are getting sharper with teams going deep on their niche. H2 2025 is going to be a lot of fun. Full-on H2 thesis dropping next week with predictions in each key vertical. [For those who have subscribed to my newsletter, I'm suuuper excited to share low hanging fruits / project-specific insights / undervalued plays that I learned during Cannes in The After Hour EP.9 dropping tomorrow] Stay tuned and have a good weekend!

Bessent is right. The left has virtually no new ideas. The only new idea they have is to move further left toward communism. Fortunately we have some time. The right had a head start with Trump 1 in reorienting the republican party toward “America First” since right populism was countervalent against the dominant woke ideology of that time. It will take some years of inter-party struggle for the democratic party to align on left populism because just as the republicans had RINOs, democrats have their own DINOs.

When I tell Europeans that a pan-european identity is forming in realtime, they always push back. You have to see it; the mass introduction of complete outsiders blurs the lines of inter-europe group differences. the rise of right wing parties only strengthens this shift;