ZeroLend 價格ZERO

RT @cburniske: Selling extremely volatile assets is harder than buying them imo, because when you buy you have limited downside (to zero),…

Ever since $QUBIC started mining $XMR, all this joking and banter between communities has been fun. I've always acted respectfully and always walked the line between joking and hurting, but after the 51% takeover, we saw the joking escalate to a more brutal level. Now, we're seeing posts like (THREATENING) people, and right now, CFB itself, so let's get to it... THE TRUTH IS, WE ALL like this gangster and outlaw attitude in $XMR, the last remaining trench of anonymity... but there's a line to be drawn between defending a currency, whatever it may be, and threatening people. DON'T come to me with this idea that the top brass in MONERO wants or will hunt down anyone, I don't believe that and it doesn't matter who is behind MONERO, we know that XMR is used for money to pass through it, but the destination of this money is ANOTHER and those who are part of the XMR community but keep shouting that XMR IS THE PLAYGROUND OF CRIMINALS, this is already hindering more than helping, after all, IF THIS WERE TRUE, THEN EVERYONE WHO SHOUTS THIS WOULD BE OPENLY REPORTING WHERE THESE BIG CRIMINALS ARE?! WOULD THEY BE POINTING THIS TO THE AUTHORITIES? And think for a second, WOULD THESE SUPPOSED CRIMINALS IN XMR BE HAPPY FOR THEIR OWN COMMUNITY POINTING OUT WHERE THEY ARE?! 🤔😒 Given the above, let's understand that: NO, THE MONERO DOME is not hunting, much less actually threatening anyone's life. However, others below them are risking something when they anonymously post threats to someone else, especially someone like @c___f___b who has several tricks up his sleeve. The chance of someone actually finding CFB and taking action against him is close to ZERO. However, the chance of people who like CFB or his creations attacking XMR prices and driving it to ZERO is very close to 100%. So, if someone encourages or gives even more exposure to any character who posts or tries to create risky situations for CFB (in this case, but it applies to everyone else), then they're not defending XMR; they're actually encouraging other prominent figures to attack the price of XMR in retaliation for the audacity and madness of threatening CFB's life (remember, this applies to everyone). Let's continue... ANOTHER point to note is: ASSUME that these ALLEGED CRIMINALS who send money via MONERO to withdraw ELSEWHERE have lower XMR prices, THEY won't stop using it...since they won't hold onto it...it's just an exit and entry point, so prices don't matter. With that in mind, you could argue that a price drop would cause delistings, which would still affect the lives of these ALLEGED CRIMINALS who could use XMR to get their money out and into other places. So I'm telling you that the current exchanges that hold XMR would most likely still be holding it there. Believe me! 😉 Anyway, those who scream that XMR is an ALLEGED CRIMINALS' PLAYGROUND should consider that if you're taking an isolated action and posting threats to others that result in the uncontrolled drop in XMR, then it's very likely that the target of these ALLEGED CRIMINALS will become the person who took the isolated action of posting threats that caused the uncontrolled drop. I repeat: I DO NOT BELIEVE that the XMR leadership is posting threats, but whoever is the clever one taking advantage of this to do so, it's best to consider the points above...because it harms everyone. Now to my friends at $QUBIC, I was quick to support the QUBIC community when I first got in touch with the team. I don't receive, nor do I want to receive, ANY dollars for this public support. I enjoyed the energy of this community and the project itself, and I publicly support the project because I like it. Therefore, I ask everyone to maintain common sense and not be disrespectful to any community. Of course, there's always that joke we like to make, but always keep the line. 🤝🏻 ...LET'S TAKE THESE DAMN BEARS OFF THE PRICE AND SEND THIS TO $500 🚀

RT @crypto_birb: I'm starting the Bitcoin Cycle Peak Countdown. We’re 997 days in. Halving math + history say the clock hits zero in a lit…

RT @Slappjakke: The Robotic Tech Stack ✅ The Generalized Robotic Brain • Physical Intelligence Pi Zero • OpenVLA • NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1…

-> Blockchains began with Proof-of-Work: raw computational energy proving that something happened. -> Then came Proof-of-Stake: economic alignment to secure consensus. -> Then zero-knowledge proofs: a way to mathematically verify without revealing details. Now, a new primitive is emerging: Proof-of-Experience. ● What do PoW and PoS fail to capture? PoW secures the chain by forcing miners to do costly work. PoS secures it by making validators stake value they risk losing. Both assume you can capture truth at the level of state transitions. But what if the “truth” you’re verifying isn’t a computation; it’s an experience? - Was the real-world moment captured accurately? - Was the stream rendered without lag? - Was the user’s AI model served on time? - Did a drone deliver the package to the right place? In the age of real-time data, consensus needs a new scope. ● Where do Guardian Nodes fit in XR, AI, and DePIN? @mawariXR built Guardian Nodes for this new scope. They don’t mine blocks. They don’t validate transactions. They attest to the fidelity of live experiences. This isn’t a metaphor. It’s a working system. In protocols tying together XR (Extended Reality), DePIN (decentralized physical infra), and AI: - Guardian Nodes verify whether a user’s view matches the intended scene - Whether latency or packet loss broke immersion - Whether content streamed was accurate, aligned, responsive If they can prove it..they earn. ● How are Guardian rewards different from mining? Traditional mining rewards completion. You prove a block was mined → you get paid. Guardian rewards are different: You prove delivery was consistent over time → you get paid. This introduces a timeline verification model. You’re not just proving something happened. You’re proving it happened smoothly, accurately, and without breakage. This is a new kind of difficulty function: Not how much power you use, but how precisely you preserve experience. ● From Execution to Experience This flips the whole validation stack on its head. - In PoW, work is atomic: mine the block, get paid. - In Guardian models, work is ambient: maintain experience, earn gradually. It's more like streaming income than mining income. But it's still crypto-native. Still programmatic. Still verifiable. And crucially: it reflects how value is experienced, not just how it’s computed. ✍️ Conclusion XR. AI. DePIN. Billions in value riding on flawless delivery. Guardian Nodes = paid to prove reality happened exactly as it should. This isn’t mining. This is monetizing the timeline.