Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert
Zero fees, no slippage
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
Important Ripple v. SEC Lawsuit Development

Important Ripple v. SEC Lawsuit Development

CryptopotatoCryptopotato2024/01/24 20:37
By:Dimitar DzhondzhorovMore posts by this author

The dispute between Ripple and the SEC intensified three months before the trial.

TL;DR

  • The SEC is seeking Ripple’s financial records for evidence in their legal case.
  • The company has previously secured favorable court rulings, including a decision on the nature of some of its XRP sales.



The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 
filed  a new motion compelling Ripple to hand over essential documents such as the company’s financial statements for 2022 and 2023 and its post-complaint XRP sales contracts.

The regulator argued that those records could provide important information and show whether the firm has violated certain securities laws.

As CryptoPotato  reported , the Commission filed the same motion earlier this month, and Ripple had until January 17 to react. 

The company first insisted the deadline for a response be prolonged to January 19 and later opposed the SEC’s wish, claiming the requests were untimely and unrelated to the case. 

“They are irrelevant: the information the SEC seeks has no bearing on the court’s remedies determination. The SEC apparently wishes to have the court substitute a summary determination as to whether Ripple’s post-complaint sales constitute investment contracts in place of a full proceeding on the merits to resolve that question,” Ripple  maintained .

The latest clash comes less than three months before  the grand trial  between the two organizations. Ripple seemingly has the upper hand, securing three major (yet partial) wins last year.

The first one came in July when Federal Judge Analisa Torres  determined  that the company’s XRP sales to retail investors did not constitute an offer of investment contracts.

Shortly after, the US magistrates dismissed the SEC’s intention to appeal the decision, whereas CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Executive Chairman Chris Larsen were cleared  of all accusations brought by the watchdog. 

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Locked for new tokens.
APR up to 10%. Always on, always get airdrop.
Lock now!