Crypto Theft May Not Be a Crime Under Current German Law
A recent ruling by a German court suggests that transferring crypto from someone else's wallet using known credentials may not violate criminal law—raising major concerns for digital asset holders.
A German appeals court has ruled that using known wallet passwords to transfer cryptocurrency without permission may not violate criminal law.
The decision is drawing sharp criticism from legal and crypto communities who warn it exposes a dangerous gap in existing statutes.
German Legal Loophole Allows Crypto Thief To Walk Free
A man helped someone (the complainant) set up a crypto wallet to hold €2.5 million worth of certain tokens.
The thief created the wallet and retained the 24-word recovery phrase. Unfortunately, the victim never changed that recovery phrase.
Later, without authorization, he used the correct recovery phrase to transfer and potentially steal all the coins. The defendant was not authorized to move the coins and gave false statements.
The Higher Regional Court of Braunschweig concluded that the defendant did not “hack” the wallet, since he used passwords he had legitimately set up and retained.
Therefore, the action did not satisfy the requirement of “overcoming a special access security” as defined under Germany’s Criminal Code.
Furthermore, the court ruled there was no deception involved, rejecting charges of computer fraud.
Blockchain systems, the court said, do not assess user intent or permission. It only affirms the presence of a valid cryptographic signature. The court also dismissed claims of data tampering.
This means that as long as someone has a valid password or recovery phrase—regardless of how they obtained it—transferring assets may not count as a crime, at least under current German law.
The ruling effectively removes criminal liability for actions that would otherwise be seen as theft in traditional finance. It highlights the legal system’s struggle to adapt to the technical structure of decentralized assets.
The court noted that while the conduct may violate civil obligations, contract breaches, or broken trust, do not automatically qualify as criminal offenses.
However, the ruling does not suggest that all crypto theft is legal. If credentials were obtained through fraud or hacking, different charges could apply. But this case centered specifically on non-technical access using pre-existing, known credentials.
For now, the judgment exposes a gray area that German lawmakers have yet to address.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Ripple releases volume 1 of its OCC banking license application
Share link:In this post: Ripple has released the first volume of its OCC banking license application, taking a formal step to increase its financial infrastructure. The firm proposes its National Trust Bank, with its application focusing on the use of RLUSD. Ripple unveils its five-man governance panel, establishing its commitment towards regulatory oversight.
Pakistan and Kyrgyzstan to deepen collaboration in crypto and blockchain innovation
Share link:In this post: Pakistan and Kyrgyzstan have agreed to deepen collaboration in crypto and blockchain innovation. Both countries also agreed to share knowledge, expertise, and best practices to help their economies. Pakistan signs several MoUs with Kyrgyzstan amid the downturn in its economic conditions.

Trump’s TMTG reports $3.1B assets, $20M loss in Q2 report
Share link:In this post: Trump Media & Technology Group reported a net loss of $20 million on net sales of $883,300 for Q2 2025. Donald Trump owns 52% of TMTG through a revocable trust, with his stake valued at approximately $1.9 billion. TMTG attributed its Q2 results to various factors, but the most notable one is reportedly its Bitcoin treasury.

India defies Trump warning, vows to continue Russian oil imports
Share link:In this post: India confirmed it will continue importing Russian oil despite Trump’s threat of penalties and a 25% tariff. Officials said no instruction has been given to oil companies to cut back on Russian crude. India now gets over 33% of its oil from Russia, up from less than 1% before the Ukraine war.

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








