Ethereum News Today: EIP-7702’s Power Turned Weapon in Million-Dollar Phishing Scandal
- Hackers exploited Ethereum's EIP-7702 to drain $1.54M from a wallet via fake DeFi transactions, exposing protocol vulnerabilities. - Malicious contracts using EIP-7702's batch transaction feature siphoned assets after users approved deceptive "routine" approvals. - Security experts warn 90%+ of EIP-7702 delegations link to scams, with multiple $1M+ losses reported since summer 2024. - Researchers urge users to verify domains, avoid unlimited token approvals, and scrutinize EIP-7702 transaction simulation
A recent phishing attack exploiting Ethereum’s EIP-7702 mechanism has left an investor with a staggering $1.54 million loss, raising significant concerns about the security implications of the protocol upgrade. The attack, which involved a batch of malicious transactions disguised as routine Uniswap swaps, underscores the risks tied to the implementation of EIP-7702, a feature introduced as part of the May Pectra hard fork. The upgrade was designed to allow externally owned accounts (EOAs) to behave like temporary smart contracts, enabling users to batch multiple transactions into a single operation. However, it has also become a vector for exploitation by cybercriminals who have weaponized its capabilities to drain digital assets from unsuspecting users [1].
Security experts, including teams at Wintermute, had previously warned that EIP-7702 delegations were being exploited at scale, with over 90% of such delegations reportedly linked to malicious contracts. These contracts, often simple copy-paste scripts, scan for vulnerable wallets and automatically siphon assets upon approval. The phishing scam that drained $1.54 million involved a fake decentralized finance (DeFi) interface that mimicked legitimate platforms, tricking the victim into authorizing what appeared to be a routine transaction. In reality, the approval unlocked hidden transfers, allowing attackers to drain the wallet almost instantly [2].
The vulnerabilities introduced by EIP-7702 have been highlighted in multiple incidents. Earlier in the summer, another investor lost $1 million in tokens and NFTs through a similar scheme. In June, a separate victim lost $66,000. These cases demonstrate a growing trend in phishing attacks that leverage the new Ethereum standard. The common thread across these incidents is the use of deceptive interfaces designed to mimic trusted DeFi platforms. Once users approve the transaction, attackers gain access to the wallet’s contents, often without the user realizing the scope of the permissions granted [3].
Security researchers and anti-fraud services, including Scam Sniffer, have urged users to exercise heightened caution when approving batch transactions. Key red flags include requests for unlimited token approvals, contract upgrades under EIP-7702, and transaction simulations that do not align with expectations. Experts stress that the malicious nature of many EIP-7702 transactions lies in their ability to appear legitimate, making them particularly dangerous for inexperienced users. They recommend verifying domain names, avoiding rushed confirmations, and using only trusted platforms to mitigate the risk of falling victim to such scams [4].
The Ethereum Foundation has yet to implement specific countermeasures to address EIP-7702-related threats, despite ongoing concerns from the security community. Analysts have called for clearer guidelines on how users should handle batch transactions and for potential updates to wallet interfaces to highlight the risks more visibly. As the use of EIP-7702 continues to grow, so does the likelihood of more sophisticated attacks. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the evolving nature of crypto threats and the importance of user education in preventing large-scale losses.

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
XRP’s Post-Regulatory Clarity Momentum and Its Long-Term Institutional Viability
- XRP's 2025 SEC "not a security" ruling unlocked institutional adoption, with 11+ ETFs under review and $1.3T in cross-border transactions via Ripple's ODL. - Layer Brett (LBRETT) offers 55,000% APY staking and Ethereum Layer 2 scalability but faces regulatory risks as a meme-driven altcoin with speculative 100x-1,000x price projections. - XRP's institutional credibility contrasts with LBRETT's retail-driven model, as Ripple partners with major firms while LBRETT's deflationary structure and governance ex

Assessing the Significance of the $164.6M Spot ETH ETF Outflow: A Cautionary Signal or a Temporary Correction?
- U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs saw a $164.6M net outflow on Aug 29, 2025, ending a six-day inflow streak led by Grayscale and Fidelity funds. - The outflow coincided with Ethereum price dips below $4,300 amid inflation fears and geopolitical risks, contrasting with Ethereum's 71% YTD gains. - Institutional investors shifted capital to safer assets like TIPS due to Fed rate delays and Trump trade policies, while retail adoption via DeFi/NFTs and Layer 2 solutions remained robust. - Technical indicators show Ethe

Can Remittix (RTX) Overtake Dogecoin and Lead the 2025 Altcoin Surge?
- 2025 crypto market pits utility-driven Remittix (RTX) against meme-driven Dogecoin (DOGE), with RTX targeting $19T remittance inefficiencies via instant cross-border payments and deflationary tokenomics. - RTX’s $22.2M presale, institutional adoption, and CertiK-audited security contrast with DOGE’s speculative reliance on social sentiment and unlimited supply, risking long-term viability. - Market rotation favors RTX as Ethereum’s utility token classification boosts institutional inflows, while DOGE fac

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








