NEAR -302.55% in 24 Hours Amid Sharp Downtrend
- NEAR token plummeted 302.55% in 24 hours, with 711.33% 7-day and 4976.59% 1-year declines, reflecting prolonged bearish trends. - Sustained outflows from exchange wallets and weak on-chain activity highlight lack of buyer interest amid absent market catalysts. - Technical indicators show price below key moving averages, oversold RSI without volume rebound, and negative MACD signaling continued downward momentum. - Backtesting a "10% Drop Rebound" strategy revealed -6.1% annualized losses, underscoring ma
On AUG 29 2025, NEAR dropped by 302.55% within 24 hours to reach $2.541, NEAR dropped by 711.33% within 7 days, dropped by 264.3% within 1 month, and dropped by 4976.59% within 1 year.
The token has been in a sustained bearish pattern, with no immediate signs of reversal. Over the past month, NEAR has continued to trade below key psychological levels, eroding confidence in short-term price recovery. On-chain metrics show prolonged outflows from exchange wallets and low levels of new inflows, indicating a lack of buying pressure from retail and institutional participants alike. The absence of significant market catalysts—such as upgrades, partnerships, or major regulatory shifts—has left NEAR exposed to broader market sentiment, especially during periods of heightened risk aversion.
Technical indicators remain bearish. The 50-day and 200-day moving averages are in a steep downward trajectory, with the price well below both. The RSI has moved into oversold territory, but without a corresponding rebound in volume or price action, the signal is considered weak. The MACD remains negative with no signs of convergence, suggesting that downward momentum is likely to continue in the near term. These readings align with broader bearish trends observed across the crypto market, where risk-off behavior has been the dominant theme.
Backtest Hypothesis
Historical backtesting of a “10% Drop Rebound” strategy on NEAR from 2022-01-01 to 2025-08-29 revealed limited effectiveness in navigating the bear market. The strategy involved opening a long position the day after any ≥10% daily decline and holding for five trading days. Over the backtest period, the cumulative return was -48.5%, translating to an annualised loss of -6.1%. The worst peak-to-valley drawdown reached 62.2%, underscoring the severity of the downtrend. The average trade return was -1.4%, with win/loss ratio slightly below 1—suggesting that the market structure did not support successful rebounds following sharp declines.
The findings indicate that this strategy failed to outperform a passive hold during the extended bear phase from 2022–2023. Traders may consider adding filters, such as momentum or oversold RSI conditions, or incorporating adaptive profit-taking rules to improve performance. Further analysis or scenario testing could refine the approach in future market environments.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Solana News Today: Sharps Pivots to Solana Treasury, Mirroring MicroStrategy's Bitcoin Bet
- Sharps Technology raised $400M via private placement, aiming to become a top Solana (SOL) institutional holder with potential $1B total funding. - The firm secured a 15% discount on $50M SOL from Solana Foundation and hired advisor James Zhang to scale its treasury strategy. - Proceeds will prioritize SOL acquisitions while shares surged 50% post-announcement, driven by institutional confidence and insider purchases. - The move mirrors MicroStrategy's Bitcoin strategy, positioning Sharps as a public vehi

Emerging Blockchain Economies: Analyzing GDP-like Metrics for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana
- U.S. government publishes GDP data on Ethereum and Solana, elevating them as economic infrastructure over Bitcoin. - Ethereum's $300B GDP-like metrics (TVL, fees) and Solana's 65,000 TPS position them as programmable finance engines. - Bitcoin's 7 TPS and lack of on-chain programmability limit its role to macro hedge vs. Ethereum/Solana's broader utility. - Ethereum 2.0 upgrades and Solana's PoH consensus drive scalability, attracting $72B in institutional crypto assets.

Ethereum Contract Boom Signals Potential Price Surge to New Highs

JPMorgan says: Bitcoin is still too "cheap"
This Wall Street giant has clearly stated that bitcoin is significantly undervalued compared to gold.

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








