Oregon's EV Mileage Tax Could Reshape the Future of Road Funding
- Oregon proposes mandatory EV pay-per-mile fees to address a $300M transportation budget shortfall, potentially becoming the second U.S. state after Hawaii to implement such a policy. - The plan includes 2.3¢/mile charges or $340 annual fees starting 2027, paired with a 6¢/gallon gas tax hike, aiming to offset declining fuel tax revenue from electrification. - Privacy concerns persist over GPS tracking and data security, while critics warn the policy risks discouraging EV adoption if perceived as punitive
Oregon is attempting to address a $300 million shortfall in its transportation budget by proposing a mandatory pay-per-mile fee for electric vehicle (EV) owners, a move that could make it the second U.S. state to implement such a policy after Hawaii. The initiative is part of a special legislative session called by Democratic Governor Tina Kotek to resolve a fiscal crisis that has already led to the suspension of nearly 500 job terminations and plans to close road maintenance stations. The state’s transportation department attributes the budget hole to inflation, declining gas tax revenue, and spending constraints.
Under Kotek’s proposal, EV drivers would pay a usage charge equivalent to 5% of Oregon’s gas tax. This would phase in starting in 2027 for certain EVs and expand to hybrids by 2028. Drivers would either pay approximately 2.3 cents per mile or choose an annual flat fee of $340. The program also includes a 6-cent increase in the state’s gas tax, raising it to 46 cents per gallon. EV drivers enrolled in the program would no longer pay supplemental registration fees. The state has a decade-old voluntary road usage charge program, which has been used to test various methods of mileage reporting, including smartphone apps and vehicle telematics.
Privacy concerns remain a significant challenge. Past surveys conducted by the state’s transportation department highlight that residents worry about GPS tracking and data security. Oregon’s voluntary program addresses these concerns by deleting mileage data 30 days after payment. However, the use of plug-in GPS devices is being phased out due to higher costs and the risk of removal. Critics, including representatives from nonprofits like Climate Solutions, argue that mandatory road usage charges could act as a disincentive for EV adoption, particularly if they are seen as a penalty rather than a fair contribution.
Hawaii, which launched a similar program in 2023, offers an optional payment of $8 per 1,000 miles driven, capped at $50, or a flat annual fee of $50. By 2028, Hawaii will require all EV drivers to enroll in the program, with odometer readings taken during annual inspections. The state plans to expand the program to all light-duty vehicles by 2033. Oregon’s approach, while distinct, mirrors Hawaii’s recognition that traditional fuel tax revenue is declining due to the increasing prevalence of electric and fuel-efficient vehicles.
Political tensions complicate the implementation of the program. Republican lawmakers have criticized the transportation department for what they perceive as mismanagement, while supporters argue the proposal is a necessary step toward long-term infrastructure funding. Experts like Liz Farmer of The Pew Charitable Trusts note that such a policy represents a “pretty major change” for most drivers and carries the challenge of public acceptance. Oregon’s experience with a voluntary program provides valuable insights into both the feasibility and the public response to mileage-based fees.
The broader implications of Oregon’s proposal extend beyond its borders. As more states face similar revenue challenges, the success or failure of this initiative could influence future policy design. Arizona, for instance, will hold a vote in 2024 on whether to ban mileage-based fees altogether. Meanwhile, federal incentives for EV purchases are set to expire, adding urgency to finding sustainable state-level funding solutions. Oregon’s decision could serve as a case study for others navigating the same transition in the era of electrification.
Source:

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
PHB -1039.6% in 24 Hours Amidst Sharp Sell-Off
- PHB plummeted 1039.6% in 24 hours, 91.24% in a month, and 6580.6% over one year amid sharp sell-offs. - Analysts cite no clear trigger but note bearish technical indicators like oversold RSI and bearish moving averages. - A backtest strategy is proposed to evaluate market responses using 10% drawdown thresholds and historical performance analysis.

Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin's $110K Standoff: Is This a Warning Shot or a Pre-Recovery Pause?
- Bitcoin neared $110,000 in August 2025, with analysts warning of potential further declines if this critical support level breaks. - Institutional activity remains muted, while retail buying in the U.S. and Hong Kong drives short-term price fluctuations. - Technical indicators show bearish signals, with $100,000 as the next downside target if consolidation fails. - Analysts are divided on whether the pullback is a temporary correction or a prolonged bear market, with no clear macroeconomic catalysts emer

Bitcoin's Enduring Mystery: How Unresolved Narratives Fuel Market Psychology and Long-Term Value
- Satoshi Nakamoto's anonymity reinforces Bitcoin's decentralized identity, shaping market psychology and institutional adoption. - Market volatility spikes when indirect Satoshi references emerge, linking Bitcoin's value to its mythos and ideological purity. - Institutions treat Bitcoin as "digital gold" due to its scarcity narrative, amplified by the untouched 1.1M "dead" coins. - Unresolved narratives buffer Bitcoin against short-term corrections, sustaining interest through speculative "what if" scenar

Positioning for a September Rate Cut and Seasonal Volatility
- The Fed's Sept 2025 meeting faces pressure to cut rates amid weak job growth (35K/mo) and 4.9% inflation, with markets pricing an 82% chance of a 25-basis-point reduction. - Proponents cite labor market tightening risks, while skeptics warn against premature easing due to inflation stickiness and tariff-driven price pressures. - Historical "September Effect" (avg 1.1% S&P 500 drop) amplifies volatility risks, compounded by seasonal liquidity declines and macroeconomic uncertainty. - Strategic allocations

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








