A decade after Buffett's "merger of the century," Kraft Heinz is reportedly close to a breakup.
Kraft Heinz Company (KHC.US) is close to finalizing a split plan, intending to separate this major American food and beverage company into two independent entities, with an official announcement possibly coming as soon as next week.
According to sources, the food giant plans to spin off its grocery business—which includes products such as Kraft Mac & Cheese, Velveeta cheese, Jell-O, and Kool-Aid—into a separate entity valued at approximately $20 billion; the remaining business will focus on faster-growing categories such as ketchup and condiments, forming a smaller independent company.
This split essentially reverses the 2015 merger between Kraft Foods Group and H.J. Heinz Company, which originally created the third-largest food and beverage company in the United States.
The 2015 merger was driven by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital. According to the agreement at the time, Kraft shareholders held 49% of the merged company, while Heinz shareholders held 51%. In addition to shares of the merged company, Kraft shareholders also received a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share, fully funded by Heinz shareholders (Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital) through equity contributions. At the time of the merger, the combined revenue of the two companies was about $28 billion, but this figure subsequently shrank to $6.35 billion.
Buffett said at the time of the merger, “I am very pleased to be involved in bringing together these two outstanding companies and their iconic brands. This is exactly the kind of transaction I like—combining two world-class organizations to create value for shareholders. I am excited about the future opportunities for this newly merged company.”
To boost profits, the newly formed Kraft Heinz Company immediately launched cost-cutting initiatives and embarked on an acquisition spree, including the failed $143 billion bid for Unilever (UL.US) in 2017.
However, while the company was busy cutting costs and seeking acquisitions, it failed to notice that consumer tastes had shifted toward healthier food choices. As market demand for processed cheese, hot dogs, and similar products declined, the company’s sales came under pressure. Ultimately, it had to admit that the valuations of its Kraft and Oscar Mayer brands were far below expectations, resulting in a $15 billion asset impairment charge.
Additionally, then-CEO Bernardo Hess also admitted the failure of zero-based budgeting (where every budget cycle requires all expenses to be justified from zero). In 2019, Hess stated, “We were overly optimistic about the effects of cost savings, and those expectations ultimately were not realized.”
Amid a series of difficulties, Kraft Heinz’s stock price continued to fall. After peaking in 2017, its share price dropped by a cumulative 61% over the decade following the merger, while the S&P 500 index rose by as much as 237% during the same period.
This performance forced Berkshire Hathaway to further write down its 27.4% stake in Kraft Heinz, following a $3 billion impairment in 2019 with an additional $3.8 billion write-down.
Weighed down by rising production costs, Kraft Heinz’s profitability has also continued to decline, and by 2025, it had fallen into losses.
With virtually no other options, the company is now considering a split to resolve its difficulties, but this strategy is unlikely to rescue the struggling food and beverage giant.
Seeking Alpha investment platform analyst Alan Galecki commented, “I don’t see any value being created by the split,” adding, “I worry that we’ll just end up with two ‘sickly’ companies.”
Another analyst team, TQP Research, added: “The proposed split requires both independent entities to achieve strong profit and loss growth, but empirical evidence shows that Kraft Heinz’s split is unlikely to create new value for shareholders.”
Wall Street seems to share this view. Since rumors of the split first emerged last month, Kraft Heinz’s stock price has risen only 3%.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Behavioral Economics of GLD: How Investor Psychology Drives Gold's Safe-Haven Appeal in Turbulent Times
- 2025 saw iShares Gold Trust (GLD) reflect behavioral economics' reflection effect, as investor fear/greed drove volatile gold demand amid geopolitical tensions. - Gold prices surged to $3,500/oz as U.S.-China/Iran/Russia-Ukraine conflicts intensified, with central banks buying 710 tonnes/quarter to diversify from U.S. dollar reserves. - Technical analysis confirmed negative correlation between declining investor sentiment and gold volatility, while UBS projected 25.7% price rebound by late 2025. - Reflec

Solana News Today: Solana's Triangle Tightens—Institutional Bets Signal $280 Climb
- Solana (SOL) forms a tightening ascending triangle near $215, signaling potential breakout to $225–$280 if resistance is overcome. - Record $43.88B monthly futures volume and institutional accumulation (Upexi, Pantera) reinforce bullish momentum above $200 support. - ETF applications (Bitwise, 21Shares) and U.S. Commerce Department blockchain adoption highlight expanding real-world utility and institutional trust. - Analysts warn ETF approval delays and crypto market volatility remain key risks to Solana

Is Bitcoin's Recent Support Breakdown a Bear Market Signal or a Classic Fakeout?
- Bitcoin's August 2025 breakdown below $110,000 sparks debate: bear market signal or temporary "fakeout"? - Technical indicators show bearish divergence (RSI oversold, 200SMA resistance), but on-chain metrics reveal mixed signals (NVT suggests utility-driven strength). - Historical parallels (2021 $42k fakeout) indicate potential rebounds if price stabilizes above $105k, though institutionalization reduces retail-driven volatility. - ETF adoption and whale repositioning create tension between short-term b

Bitcoin as a Premium Asset in High-Value Transactions: The Rise of Crypto in Luxury Real Estate
- Grant Cardone’s $43M Miami mansion listed for 400 Bitcoin highlights crypto’s growing role in luxury real estate transactions. - Institutional investors boost Bitcoin confidence via $9.485M WBTC purchase, signaling bullish sentiment and DeFi integration. - Analysts project $125K–$145K Bitcoin peak by 2025, driven by halving events, 401(k) adoption, and macroeconomic hedging demand. - Hybrid real estate-crypto models reduce counterparty risk but challenge regulators with AML/KYC enforcement in decentraliz

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








