Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert
Zero fees, no slippage
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
Facing Trump 2.0, Democrats Fall into Infighting: Economy vs. Democracy? Midterm Election Prospects Worrying

Facing Trump 2.0, Democrats Fall into Infighting: Economy vs. Democracy? Midterm Election Prospects Worrying

新浪财经新浪财经2025/09/01 00:41
Show original
By:新浪财经

As U.S. President Trump openly considers sending troops to more American cities, Democratic leaders in Congress have almost unanimously described his actions as a means of “diverting attention”—an attempt to shift public focus away from other issues, whether it be the rising cost of living, his signing of legislation to implement massive Medicaid cuts, or the controversy surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein files.

CNN reports that now, the term “diverting attention” is completely splitting the two competing theories within the Democratic Party on “how to respond to Trump’s radical second term.”

The Democratic leadership in Congress believes that focusing on economic issues gives Democrats the best chance to make progress in next year’s midterm elections; but many activists within the party counter that they have failed to convey the urgency of “Trump taking comprehensive action to erode American democracy.”

The top political strategists of the Democratic Party are also similarly divided. Some believe that Trump’s victory in 2024 indicates the need to be “highly focused” on the economic difficulties of ordinary families; others are convinced that taking a mild stance on Trump’s actions undermining democratic safeguards (especially the domestic deployment of troops) is not only a moral failure but also an electoral miscalculation.

Veteran Democratic pollster Celinda Lake stated that describing Trump’s actions as “diverting attention” is “completely wrong,” adding, “I think this completely misunderstands what Democrats are truly concerned about.”

Lake pointed out that if Democratic leaders stick to this strategy, Democratic candidates in 2026 “will face voter turnout problems that will make the turnout dilemma of 2024 look trivial.”

Other key Democratic figures believe that only by winning back control of the House of Representatives next year can Democrats slow Trump’s pace, and that “primarily focusing on economic issues” is the best way to achieve this goal.

Democratic pollster Ben Tulchin said: “Based on my research on those voters we ‘once lost and now need to win back’... there is only one key issue: the economy, the economy, and still the economy.”

Democrats in this camp cite “the victory of a Democratic state senate candidate in Iowa in last week’s special election” as proof that their strategy is correct—the candidate ran in a deep red district (traditionally Republican) with the campaign slogan of “improving affordability of life,” and ultimately won the election.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

Solana News Today: Solana's 150ms Finality Revolution: Could It Outrace Ethereum?

- Solana's validator community nears approval of Alpenglow upgrade, slashing block finality to 150ms via Votor and Rotor components. - Upgrade enables 107,540 TPS (vs. Ethereum's 15-45 TPS) and introduces decentralized economic incentives to reduce centralization risks. - 99% voter support with 33% quorum met, positioning Solana to challenge Ethereum in DeFi, gaming, and institutional finance sectors. - Critics warn VAT model may favor large validators, but network's 20+20 resilience model and $8.6B DeFi T

ainvest2025/09/01 02:33
Solana News Today: Solana's 150ms Finality Revolution: Could It Outrace Ethereum?

VANA -116.86% in 24 Hours Amid Sharp Decline in Volatility and Liquidity

- VANA’s 24-hour price drop of 116.86% reflects severe market pressures and liquidity decline. - Analysts attribute the decline to reduced liquidity and shifting investor sentiment toward established assets. - Technical indicators (RSI, MACD) remain bearish, with no stabilizing forces in the ecosystem. - A backtesting strategy evaluates RSI/MACD signals to predict trend continuation or reversal. - Prolonged bearish momentum highlights structural weaknesses in VANA’s market resilience.

ainvest2025/09/01 02:33
VANA -116.86% in 24 Hours Amid Sharp Decline in Volatility and Liquidity

COW -6255.05% in 1 Year Amid Sharp Short- and Mid-Term Price Declines

- COW's price plummeted 127.26% in 24 hours, 6255.05% annually, marking extreme bearish momentum. - Technical indicators show COW trading below key moving averages with RSI in oversold territory, lacking reversal signals. - Analysts warn of continued downward pressure, noting no near-term support levels to halt the decline. - Backtesting strategies suggest adapting to bearish bias using RSI divergence and bearish crossovers for shorting opportunities.

ainvest2025/09/01 02:33
COW -6255.05% in 1 Year Amid Sharp Short- and Mid-Term Price Declines

Bitcoin's 'Red September' Risk: Whale Sell-Offs and Market Vulnerability

- Bitcoin's "Red September" pattern sees average 3.77% monthly declines since 2013, driven by seasonal rebalancing and Fed policy uncertainty. - A $2.7B whale selloff in August 2025 triggered a $100B market crash, highlighting large holders' outsized influence on liquidity. - Institutional profit-taking reached $3.5B in September 2025, with synchronized selling across all wallet groups signaling a maturing market. - Growing institutional adoption (ETF inflows, record futures open interest) has reduced corr

ainvest2025/09/01 02:30
Bitcoin's 'Red September' Risk: Whale Sell-Offs and Market Vulnerability