Institutional Anxiety and Economic Instability Trigger $660 Million Withdrawal from Crypto ETFs
- Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs saw $660M combined outflows, reflecting institutional caution amid macroeconomic uncertainty and Fed rate cuts. - BlackRock’s IBIT gained $79.7M inflows, contrasting Fidelity’s FBTC (-$114.8M) and Grayscale’s BITB (-$80.5M) as top Bitcoin outflow leaders. - Ethereum ETFs recorded $251.2M outflows for four consecutive days, with Fidelity’s FETH (-$158.1M) and Grayscale’s ETHE (-$30.3M) as key contributors. - Bitcoin dropped to $108,700 (four-week low) while Ethereum fell 12.5% in
Bitcoin and
The outflows from Bitcoin ETFs coincided with a drop in total assets under management (AUM) for the asset class, which fell to $144.3 billion—representing 6.64% of Bitcoin’s total market value. While historical cumulative inflows reached $57.2 billion, recent withdrawals have shaken investor confidence. Ethereum ETFs also saw their AUM shrink to $25.6 billion, or 5.46% of ETH’s market cap, with total inflows at $13.37 billion. The ongoing withdrawals from both BTC and ETH ETFs reflect broader economic uncertainty, including the Federal Reserve’s recent rate reduction and anticipation of new inflation data.
Bitcoin’s value dropped to a four-week low of $108,700 on September 25, while Ethereum slid to $3,956, extending a week-long slide of 12.5%. According to on-chain analytics provider Glassnode, long-term holders realized profits on more than 3.4 million BTC, causing a sense of “exhaustion” in the market. Experts cautioned that if Bitcoin tests support near $107,500, further declines could be triggered by stop-loss selling. Ethereum’s technical signals also pointed to weakness, with its relative strength index (RSI) falling to 14.5—the lowest since June 2025.
Institutional activity revealed different approaches among leading ETF issuers. BlackRock’s IBIT continued to lead the Bitcoin ETF sector, holding $84.35 billion in AUM and $60.86 billion in cumulative inflows. In contrast, Fidelity and Grayscale experienced notable redemptions, suggesting investors are favoring funds with lower fees. For Ethereum, BlackRock’s ETHA remained unchanged, while Fidelity’s FETH continued to see the largest outflows. The performance gap between Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs highlights diverging institutional attitudes, with Bitcoin enjoying a net inflow of $241 million on September 24, while Ethereum continued to face withdrawals.
The withdrawals occurred alongside a broader downturn in the crypto market. The global crypto market cap fell by 1.45% in 24 hours, with both Bitcoin and Ethereum losing over 1.5%. Analysts attributed the decline to profit-taking, economic uncertainty, and seasonal trends, as September is typically a weak month for cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin ETF trading volumes reached $5.42 billion on September 25, while Ethereum ETF volumes totaled $972.04 million. The difference in institutional participation—$9.18 billion in Bitcoin ETF volumes versus $4.64 billion for Ethereum—underscored Bitcoin’s ongoing appeal to institutional investors, despite recent outflows.
Looking forward, the market stands at a pivotal point. If inflows into Bitcoin ETFs stabilize or reverse, it could indicate renewed institutional trust and support a price rebound. However, continued outflows may intensify bearish trends, especially if the macroeconomic environment worsens. For Ethereum, the fourth straight day of outflows raises concerns about competition from other networks and regulatory challenges, though a recovery above $3,900 could spark short-term gains. Analysts stressed the need to watch on-chain data, such as transaction activity and hash rates, for signs of a potential turnaround in the coming weeks.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
A detailed overview of technology layoffs in 2025
PENGU Price Forecast for 2025: Steering Through Regulatory Challenges and Growing Institutional Confidence
- Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) faces regulatory uncertainty from SEC delays and EU MiCA, causing 30% price drops due to compliance risks. - Institutional interest grows with $273K whale accumulation and rising OBV, contrasting retail fear (Fear & Greed Index at 28). - Ecosystem expansion via Pudgy World and penguSOL, plus Bitso partnership, aims to boost utility but depends on user adoption and regulation. - Expert forecasts diverge: $0.02782 (CoinCodex) vs. $0.068 (CoinDCX), with technical analysis highlighting

PENGU USDT Selling Indicator and What It Means for Stablecoin Approaches
- PENGU/USDT's 2025 collapse triggered $128M liquidity shortfall, exposing systemic risks in algorithmic stablecoins. - Technical indicators (RSI 40.8, bearish MACD) and 52.55% 30-day price drop signal deepening market distrust. - Regulatory frameworks (GENIUS Act, MiCA) and AI-driven risk analytics emerge as critical responses to algorithmic vulnerabilities. - Experts urge hybrid models combining CBDC stability with AI governance to address algorithmic stablecoins' inherent fragility.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Token: Analyzing the Drivers and Longevity Behind Its Latest Price Rally
- Hyperliquid's HYPE token surged to $42.03 in 2025 from $3.20, driven by product upgrades (HyperEVM, HyperCore) and institutional adoption. - Strategic partnerships with Anchorage Digital and Circle , plus regulatory compliance, boosted credibility and decentralized trading volume (73% market share by 2025). - Bitcoin's $123k high in July 2025 correlated with HYPE's peak, reflecting broader crypto market optimism for low-fee decentralized futures infrastructure. - Sustainability risks include token unlock
