Hyperliquid Founder Addresses Revenue Prioritization Concerns
- Jeff Yan addresses trader concerns about Hyperliquid’s revenue model.
- Hyperliquid focuses on benefiting users through ADL.
- Potential profitability impact for users highlighted.
Hyperliquid prioritizes revenue over trader concerns by employing an Automatic Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism that shifts profits to users and mitigates risk. Founder Jeff Yan clarified the model, emphasizing its impact, including token buybacks worth $645 million.
Jeff Yan, founder of Hyperliquid , recently clarified the platform’s approach to revenue, addressing trader concerns regarding its revenue model. Yan emphasized that Hyperliquid aims to benefit users through its Automatic Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism.
Amid questions about Hyperliquid’s focus on protocol revenue over traders, this clarification holds significance for users and market observers. The response showcases transparency over profit distribution.
The recent focus by Hyperliquid on its revenue model sparked responses, especially concerning the Automatic Deleveraging mechanism. Jeff Yan clarified that this model generates profits while mitigating risks, benefiting users with net financial gains.
In his statements, Yan addressed misconceptions that suggested Hyperliquid prioritized protocol revenue. He used platforms like X to emphasize that their mechanism is designed for user profit, particularly during high liquidation events.
Immediate market reactions were mixed, with some praising the platform’s transparency and others concerned about potential risk exposure. Hyperliquid’s decisions continue to impact user confidence and the broader DeFi ecosystem.
“The ADL event on October 10th generated hundreds of millions of dollars in net profits for users.” — Jeff Yan, Founder, Hyperliquid
Financial implications involve potential shifts in user trust and investment strategies. The platform’s mechanisms could affect DeFi market stability and user engagement, particularly with the ongoing focus on profit distribution.
With Hyperliquid’s stance clarified, industry participants are keenly observing the financial and technological outcomes. Historical trends suggest that similar mechanisms have led to user skepticism but also potential profitability, indicating a foundational shift in how DeFi platforms engage traders.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
COAI Experiences Significant Price Decline in Late November 2025: Is the Market Overreacting or Does This Present a Contrarian Investment Chance?
- ChainOpera AI (COAI) plummeted 90% in late 2025 due to CEO resignation, $116M losses, and regulatory ambiguity from the CLARITY Act. - Market panic and 88% supply concentration in top wallets amplified the selloff, while stablecoin collapses worsened liquidity risks. - Contrarians highlight C3 AI's 26% YoY revenue growth and potential 2026 regulatory clarity as signs of mispriced long-term AI/crypto opportunities. - Technical indicators suggest $22.44 as a critical resistance level, with analysts warning

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price Rally: An In-Depth Look at Protocol Advancements and Liquidity Trends
- Hyperliquid's HYPE token surged 3.03% amid HIP-3 upgrades enabling permissionless perpetual markets and USDH stablecoin launch. - Protocol innovations boosted liquidity by 15% but failed to halt market share erosion to under 20% against competitors like Aster. - Structural challenges persist through token unstaking, unlocks, and OTC sales, yet HyENA's $50M 48-hour volume signaled renewed engagement. - Whale accumulation of $19.38M near $45-46 and HYPE buybacks aim to stabilize price, though long-term suc

ChainOpera AI Token Plummets Unexpectedly: Is This a Warning Sign for Crypto Investors Focused on AI?
- ChainOpera AI's 96% value collapse in late 2025 exposed critical risks in centralized, opaque AI-driven crypto projects. - 87.9% token concentration in ten wallets enabled manipulation, while untested AI algorithms and lack of audits eroded trust. - Regulatory ambiguity from delayed U.S. CLARITY Act and EU AI Act created fragmented frameworks, deterring institutional participation. - Post-crash trends prioritize decentralized governance, auditable smart contracts, and compliance with AML/KYC protocols fo

Modern Monetary Theory and the Transformation of Cryptocurrency Valuation Models in 2025
- Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) reshaped crypto valuation in 2025, transitioning digital assets from speculative tools to institutional liquidity instruments amid low-yield environments. - Central banks and 52% of hedge funds adopted MMT-aligned CBDCs and regulated stablecoins, with BlackRock's IBIT ETF managing $50B as crypto gained portfolio diversification status. - Regulatory divergence (e.g., U.S. CLARITY Act vs. New York BitLicense) created volatility, exemplified by the Momentum (MMT) token's 1,300%
