ARK Invest sees institutions offset early Bitcoin whales’ sell-off
Bitcoin’s market structure is changing as its long-time owners sell and institutions buy aggressively. A new ARK Invest analysis reveals that much of the selling pressure from early adopters, commonly referred to as “whales” in business parlance, is now being offset by growing institutional demand through ETFs and public company treasuries.
This tug-of-war is shaping the current bull cycle and may persist into 2026. Bitcoin’s “liveliness” index has grown to 0.89, its highest ever reading since 2018. This metric tracks the movement of long-held coins by comparing total coin-days destroyed to the total ever created. A rising liveliness score indicates older coins are being moved or sold.
On a technical note, ARK observes that the rise suggests long-term holders have been taking profits at the fastest pace since 2021. A number of these coins have been in circulation for years, indicating that early adopters are holding onto their supply after a run of favorable price results. You can now see this trend in the decrease in “vaulted” supply – the name ARK uses for coins held long-term without movement. Around 7.97 million BTC were considered to be vaulted at the beginning of 2024.
By the beginning of 2025, this had fallen to around 7.55 million. On November 15, 2025, the vaulted supply fell further to approximately 7.32 million BTC. This decline is a sign that early holders are freeing up liquidity and benefiting from a high-demand market. Similar surges in robust liveliness during past cycles have accompanied periods when long-term holders distribute, typically during strong price rallies.
Institutional demand absorbs the flow
At launch, ETF holdings were zero BTC; however, they quickly grew to 1,125,507 BTC on January 1, 2025. This number reached approximately 1,332,379 BTC by November 15, 2025. Public company holdings have also soared. The number of companies with Bitcoin, such as those with digital asset treasury strategies, rose from 271,996 BTC at the beginning of 2024 to 598,995 BTC by January 2025.
Meanwhile, in mid-November 2025, holdings more than doubled again to roughly 1,056,367 BTC. ETFs and corporate treasuries had combined to control an estimated 2,388,746 BTC. This constitutes at least one of the biggest concentrations of institutional Bitcoin ownership in the asset’s history.
ARK analysis has suggested that from January 2024 to November 15, 2025, the ETFs and public companies received approximately 1,466,102 BTC after accounting for inflows and vaulted supply.
Year-to-date movements are similar, with a net balance of approximately 428,721 BTC flowing from long-held to institutional buyers. This is a structural transfer of ownership, with early adopters handing over supply to institutions entering Bitcoin as a formal asset class.
Institutions drive new market structure
ARK concludes that this change might shape the future of how Bitcoin behaves. Institutional demand responds to overall economic and monetary scenarios.
If US dollar liquidity improves—for instance, if the Federal Reserve ends quantitative tightening and begins cutting interest rates—institutions may seek to increase their holdings of US dollars.
Those conditions, ARK says, may increasingly become the case as inflation cools and policymakers seek to shore up growth. Institutions might ramp up their build-up toward late 2025 and into 2026.
In the case of Bitcoin, this will mean additional price support during corrections and greater liquidity in rallies. So as more corporate treasuries, ETFs, and asset managers enter the space, Bitcoin may be held more tightly — while whales take their profits too.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
South Korea's Approach to Crypto Regulation Could Become a Model for Global Stability and Innovation
- South Korea's Digital Asset Basic Act (2025) establishes a unified regulatory framework for crypto assets, targeting stablecoins and cross-border transactions. - Stablecoin issuers face licensing, reserve requirements, and FSC oversight, while foreign VASPs must register and report transactions to combat forex crimes. - The reforms aim to balance innovation with financial stability, potentially attracting investment but increasing compliance costs for firms and scrutiny for investors. - As Asia's major c

Ethereum News Update: Ethereum Whale Makes $1.33B Leveraged Move—Sign of Confidence or Risky Overextension?
- Ethereum whale "66kETHBorrow" injected $1.33B into ETH via leveraged Aave borrowing, stabilizing prices near $3,500. - Whale's 385k ETH holdings and $270M Aave-funded purchases signal institutional confidence despite market volatility. - Analysts note leveraged accumulation often precedes recoveries, though risks include amplified losses if prices correct further. - Market remains divided as whale's strategy contrasts with $183M Ethereum ETF outflows and key support/resistance levels.
Algorand (ALGO) Falls 54.47% Over the Past Year as Company Developments and Market Challenges Persist
- Algorand (ALGO) fell 54.47% in one year due to macro pressures and lack of product milestones. - Biopharma firms Aligos and Allogene announced stock incentives/insider transactions unrelated to crypto. - Prolonged crypto bear market and weak adoption left ALGO vulnerable to sector-wide declines. - Investors await Algorand Foundation updates amid ongoing volatility and uncertain valuation metrics.

Lloyds Completes Curve Purchase Amid Shareholder Disputes Over Valuation
- Lloyds acquires Curve for £120M amid shareholder backlash over undervaluation and governance concerns. - IDC Ventures, Curve's largest investor, rejects the deal via legal action, disputing transparency and valuation. - Lloyds aims to integrate Curve's payment tech to compete with Apple/Google Pay amid EU regulatory shifts. - The acquisition reflects fintech consolidation as banks exploit lower valuations to fast-track digital infrastructure. - Legal challenges and governance disputes could delay the dea

