Does USPS's Legal Shield Cover Deliberate Mail Slowdowns? Supreme Court Set to Decide

Bitget App

Trade smarter

Bitget

News

Markets

Does USPS's Legal Shield Cover Deliberate Mail Slowdowns? Supreme Court Set to Decide

Bitget-RWA2025/11/26 21:14

By:Bitget-RWA

- U.S. Supreme Court to decide if USPS's FTCA immunity covers intentional mail delays in Lebene Konan's case. - Konan claims employees withheld her mail for 24 months due to racial bias; Fifth Circuit ruled intentional acts are not exempt. - USPS warns a ruling for Konan could trigger lawsuits over minor issues, increasing legal risks and costs. - Case highlights accountability concerns amid reliance on mail for critical transactions like medical supplies and legal documents. - Decision expected in 2026 ma

The U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to take up a significant legal dispute concerning the U.S. Postal Service's (USPS) protection from lawsuits related to mishandled mail, following a two-year legal battle brought by Texas landlord Lebene Konan. This case, which has attracted widespread attention from legal scholars and lawmakers, focuses on whether the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) postal exemption applies when postal workers are accused of intentionally failing to deliver mail. Konan, who works in real estate and insurance, alleges that two USPS employees in Euless, Texas, purposefully withheld her mail for two years, motivated by racial bias and prejudice against property owners.

The outcome could alter the boundaries of federal agency responsibility

and potentially change how the postal service is held accountable in court.

The heart of the dispute is the interpretation of the FTCA's postal exemption, which protects the USPS from being sued for "loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission" of mail. Konan's attorneys contend that this protection should not extend to deliberate wrongdoing, such as the alleged intentional labeling of her mail as "undeliverable" or "return to sender."

A federal district court originally threw out her lawsuit under this exemption

, but in 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturned that ruling,

finding that the case involved purposeful conduct

rather than an ordinary mistake. The appellate court pointed out that the exemption's wording does not specifically rule out claims based on intentional inaction by postal staff.

Does USPS's Legal Shield Cover Deliberate Mail Slowdowns? Supreme Court Set to Decide image 0

The USPS has expressed concern that a decision favoring Konan could result in a wave of lawsuits over mail delays, even for minor or questionable complaints. Frederick Liu, who serves as assistant to the Solicitor General, argued during the hearing that the government's stance is not about "fearmongering" but about avoiding unnecessary lawsuits over routine postal matters.

He referenced hypothetical examples

- such as a postal worker withholding mail because of a "rude comment" or the presence of a "large dog at the door" - to demonstrate how the system could be misused. Justice Samuel Alito shared these worries,

raising the question of whether a sweeping decision could result

in much higher postage fees to offset legal risks.

Konan's lawyers, on the other hand, challenge the idea of a flood of lawsuits. Her attorney, Easha Anand, maintained that cases like Konan's are unusual and that the USPS would still be protected from most claims related to mail issues, even if the Supreme Court sides with her client.

She emphasized that this lawsuit arises from exceptional circumstances

: Konan asserts she was the victim of systemic racial bias and suffered financial losses, including missed rental income after tenants left due to undelivered mail. The case also brings attention to broader issues of postal service responsibility, especially as more people depend on mail for essential items like medical supplies and legal paperwork.

The Supreme Court's ruling, anticipated in early 2026, is expected to have significant consequences for both USPS operations and individuals. If the Court rules in Konan's favor, the postal service may need to implement stricter controls over employee behavior; if the case is dismissed, the current legal protections for the agency against intentional misconduct claims will remain in place.

Legal experts such as Kevin Kosar

from the American Enterprise Institute believe the decision could depend on whether the Court chooses to limit the exemption's reach, weighing the importance of accountability against the potential for excessive litigation.

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops

Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR

Lock now!

- Ripple's RLUSD stablecoin received ADGM approval as a regulated fiat-referenced token in Abu Dhabi, enabling institutional use in payments and treasury management. - Pegged 1:1 to the USD with NYDFS oversight, RLUSD ($1.2B market cap) offers compliance-driven alternatives to USDT/USDC amid global regulatory scrutiny. - UAE's ADGM-DIFC regulatory framework positions the region as a crypto innovation hub, with Ripple expanding partnerships through Zand Bank and Mamo fintech . - The approval aligns with UAE

Bitget-RWA•2025/11/27 11:08

XRP News Today: With Tether and USDC under examination, RLUSD from the UAE stands out as a regulatory-compliant stablecoin option.

ZK Atlas Enhancement: Driving Institutional Embrace Amid the Blockchain Scalability Competition

- ZKsync's Atlas Upgrade solves throughput bottlenecks with Airbender RISC-V zkVM, enabling 15,000+ TPS at $0.0001 per transaction. - Modular ZKsync OS reduces gas fees by 70% since 2023, enabling real-time financial applications while maintaining regulatory compliance. - Deutsche Bank and UBS test ZKsync for asset tokenization, highlighting its institutional appeal through privacy-preserving ZK features and sub-second finality. - Upcoming Fusaka upgrade aims to push TPS to 30,000 by December 2025, but reg

Bitget-RWA•2025/11/27 11:02

ZK Atlas Enhancement: Driving Institutional Embrace Amid the Blockchain Scalability Competition

Bitcoin Updates: Bitcoin Receives Major-Cap Status as Nasdaq Increases Options Limits Fourfold

- Nasdaq seeks SEC approval to quadruple IBIT options limits from 250,000 to 1 million contracts, aligning Bitcoin ETF with high-liquidity assets like EEM and GLD . - The proposal cites IBIT's $86.2B market cap, 44.6M daily shares traded, and industry support for addressing institutional demand amid Bitcoin's rapid financial instrument maturation. - Experts argue higher limits will reduce spreads, enable sophisticated hedging, and treat Bitcoin as a "mega-cap asset," while Nasdaq also seeks unlimited FLEX

Bitget-RWA•2025/11/27 10:50

Bitcoin Updates: Bitcoin Receives Major-Cap Status as Nasdaq Increases Options Limits Fourfold

XRP Update: ADGM's Green Light for RLUSD Strengthens UAE's Pursuit of Digital Financial Growth

- Ripple's RLUSD stablecoin secured ADGM approval as an institutional fiat-backed token in November 2025, following DIFC's June 2025 greenlight. - The UAE's dual regulatory endorsements position RLUSD for cross-border settlements, with $1.2B market cap driven by institutional demand for collateral and treasury tools. - ADGM's stringent oversight framework requires full reserve backing and AML compliance, aligning RLUSD with global standards under NYDFS charter . - XRP prices surged 24% in late 2025 amid $1

Bitget-RWA•2025/11/27 10:50