Crypto Public Opinion Battle: A Record of the Fancy Back-and-Forth Between Monad Founder and Arthur Hayes
Author: jk, Odaily
Original Title: A Showcase of the Heated Debate Between Monad Founder and Arthur Hayes
On November 29, BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes publicly criticized Monad, which had just launched its mainnet 6 days prior, during an interview with Altcoin Daily. He claimed it "could drop 99%" and labeled it as "yet another high market cap, low float VC coin." These remarks quickly spread, prompting Monad co-founder Keone Hon to respond directly on X, leading to a fierce public confrontation.
The following is a complete record of their conversation.
Full Conversation
Keone Hon, Monad Founder
Dear @CryptoHayes, I respect everything you’ve built for this industry. Perpetual contracts are an incredible innovation, and I believe they will continue to grow rapidly. You have had a huge impact on our industry.
Over the past few days, I’ve seen you comment on Monad several times. While I’m sure some comments may have been taken out of context, I thought you might be interested in what makes Monad different, and why it’s not just another L1.
I believe that when you were innovating at BitMEX, you also had to deal with a lot of FUD, and you simply responded directly and then moved forward. I plan to do the same.
Here are some key points about what makes Monad unique:
-
It’s really fast. When you withdraw from Coinbase, funds arrive in 1-2 seconds. The experience feels almost magical.
-
It’s built on an entirely new tech stack, making this speed possible in a highly decentralized network. There are currently 170 globally distributed validator nodes, with more to come. You can view the real-time network topology here: [link]
-
This is important because while everyone says blockchains must be centralized, must be data center chains (or single sequencer) to achieve high performance, Monad proves the opposite is possible. Enterprises, asset issuers, and global developers want decentralization and credible neutrality—they don’t want to be at the mercy of a single sequencer.
-
The Monad codebase is fully open source and audited, built entirely from scratch in C++ and Rust, introducing many high-frequency trading style optimizations.
-
Monad introduces MonadBFT, a cutting-edge consensus mechanism that solves the tail fork problem of pipelined consensus. This alone is a huge advancement, because BFT consensus itself requires multiple rounds of communication; pipelined (interleaved) block production is the only way to achieve fast block times; but previously, pipelining was vulnerable to 1-block reorganizations (tail forks), leading to MEV attacks. But not anymore!
-
Monad introduces asynchronous execution, further improving efficiency by allowing consensus and execution to proceed in separate lanes. Ethereum is attempting to adopt this technology.
-
Monad also has a series of other technical innovations, such as a full JIT compiler that compiles EVM bytecode to native code, a new database (MonadDb), a new block propagation mechanism (RaptorCast), and parallel execution.
-
The ecosystem is just getting started, but already a batch of new applications are being built by a group of young and energetic builders.
-
The Monad Foundation and Category Labs team are going all out, ready to continue pushing the field forward. Research contributions in asynchronous execution, gas pricing, and privacy will continue to drive the industry forward. This is the 6th day since mainnet launch, and our excellent team will continue to do things differently.
-
Finally, MON is the first token on Coinbase’s token sale platform, aiming to get as many people as possible involved before public launch. The token sale used a "bottom-up fill" approach, so whales couldn’t grab the entire allocation like in many other launches.
If you want some MON to try out the network, let me know, I’d be happy to send you some. Thanks again for your contributions to the space—see you on-chain.
Arthur Hayes, BitMEX Founder, KOL
I know nothing about your technology. I’m sure it’s great, and everyone who mentions you and your team says you’re insanely smart. But your tokenomics almost guarantee that MON will only go down.
Tell your community how this chain can absorb 90% of the tokens without crashing. Tell your community how much real usage is needed to generate organic demand to absorb the sell pressure after early investors and team members unlock. There’s nothing wrong with them selling—your early supporters and team took risks and deserve good returns. Tell the community how, with staking rewards and about 1% monthly inflation, you’ll maintain this price level. Go ahead and educate me. I don’t care what your tech does, I’m a trader. Write me a long paragraph about capital flows and make me look like an idiot.
Until then, MON is a hot potato. It’s fun for short-term trading, but due to supply and demand, the overall trend will only be down.
Keone Hon
I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but it’s incorrect.
The inflation rate is 2% per year, far lower than almost all other L1s.
Locked tokens cannot be staked, which is also quite unprecedented.
The Coinbase token sale used a "retail-first fill" approach, prioritizing retail participants.
Everything was built from scratch to meaningfully expand the boundaries of what truly decentralized blockchains can do.
You only live once—it’s worth a try.
I think if you take a closer look at what my team and I are doing, you’ll find a lot of things are different. We’re not just copying the same playbook.
If you have any specific criticisms of Monad, please let me know—I’m all ears.
Arthur Hayes
Unlock all the tokens now, and you’ll be different from all the so-called $ETH killers before you. If you’ve got the guts, do it.
Keone Hon
You didn’t answer my question—do you have any specific criticisms of Monad? I’m pretty sure the companies in your VC portfolio also have locked tokens.
Also, you yourself said you’ve heard our team is talented and the tech is good. What if it actually works? The current state of blockchains can’t be the final form. If we all thought like you, everyone should just pack up and go home.
Arthur Hayes
It’s all about flow, bro. Do you dare unlock all the tokens now and let the market find the real price for your coin?
(As of press time, the two sides have not further escalated their exchange.)
Community Reaction: Hayes, You’ve Gone Too Far
This confrontation sparked a lot of discussion in the crypto community, with many questioning the logic of Hayes’ criticism.
Some dug up Hayes’ previous remarks and directly asked: Then why did you think it could rise to $10 before?
Others took a more macro perspective on the debate. @0xMardiansyah believes this precisely reflects the fundamental divide between traders and developers: traders don’t care about technology, only price; while developers painstakingly build from scratch, considering everything including tokenomics, only to be judged by those who only look at the charts.
@NFT5lut said: Hayes is just Monad’s Barry Silbert. Aside from creating panic to get people to sell and then buying the dip himself, he’s never been right about anything.
MON Price Trend
The Monad mainnet officially launched on November 24, with MON token trading starting at the same time.
Notably, MON’s first day was lackluster, with the opening price briefly falling below the public sale price—a relatively mild performance for a highly anticipated L1 token. In sharp contrast to recent projects like Plasma that sold out instantly, MON’s public sale took longer to clear, but then slowly climbed. However, nearly a week after mainnet launch, MON’s price has dropped from above $0.04 at its peak and is now fluctuating around $0.03.
An Asymmetric Public Opinion Battle
The interesting thing about this clash is that the two sides are not even debating on the same dimension.
In the court of public opinion, commentators have more advantage than builders. Hayes made it clear from the start: "I know nothing about your technology," "I don’t care what your tech does, I’m a trader." Hayes’ argument isn’t new—"high FDV, low float VC coins will eventually fall" has been one of the most mainstream crypto narratives of the past two years. Many retail investors have lost money in projects with similar structures, and this collective memory makes any criticism pointing to "VC extraction" resonate easily, especially in a bear market.
In terms of communication effect, Hayes definitely hit the emotional nerve.
For Keone, this is a tough battle to win. Technical advantages need time to be proven, ecosystem prosperity requires developers to vote with their feet, while Hayes’ skepticism is immediate, intuitive, and easy to understand.
This is a debate that will never have a conclusion. What will truly determine Monad’s fate is whether, in the coming years, developers actually build something valuable on it.
From this perspective, what Keone said isn’t wrong: "You only live once—it’s worth a try."
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
An overview of two new projects in the Polkadot ecosystem and what they will bring to Polkadot Hub

HIC: Continue to bring truly valuable new projects to Polkadot in a sluggish market!

Three cases demonstrate what Revive and Polkadot Hub can achieve!

Bridging the Development Gap: How is HashKey Ushering in a New Era for Web3 in Asia?
HashKey Group, which is currently striving for a listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, reveals a clear path for us through its unique business strategies and practices.
