The Influence of ZKsync’s Vitalik-Endorsed Scaling Technology on Ethereum’s Prospective Supremacy
- Vitalik Buterin's 2025 endorsement of ZKsync positions zero-knowledge proofs as Ethereum's scalability solution, enhancing transaction throughput to 15,000 TPS with near-zero fees. - Institutional partnerships, including Deutsche Bank's DAMA 2 and Sony's supply chain solutions, demonstrate ZKsync's enterprise-grade scalability and RWA integration. - ZKsync's 43,000 TPS (post-Atlas) and $15B institutional capital outpace Arbitrum's 45% TVL, signaling a shift toward privacy-centric, enterprise-focused bloc
Ethereum’s Next Chapter: ZKsync and the Evolution of Blockchain Scalability
The future of Ethereum depends on its capacity to expand efficiently while maintaining its decentralized and secure nature. In 2025, Vitalik Buterin’s public support for ZKsync marked a significant turning point, establishing zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs as a foundational technology for Ethereum’s continued development. By harnessing ZKsync’s innovative features and forging strong institutional alliances, Ethereum is overcoming previous scalability challenges and drawing increased interest and investment from the traditional finance sector—an essential move to reinforce its leadership in the blockchain space.
Vitalik Buterin’s Support and ZKsync’s Innovations
Vitalik Buterin’s endorsement of ZKsync in November 2025 brought attention to the platform’s crucial role in Ethereum’s scaling plans. He praised ZKsync’s notable contributions, especially the Atlas upgrade, which elevated transaction throughput to 15,000 transactions per second (TPS) while keeping fees minimal and achieving near-instant finality using ZK technology. This aligns with Buterin’s broader vision of ZK proofs as the future of Ethereum, enhancing transaction security, privacy, and decentralization.
The upcoming Fusaka upgrade is expected to further boost throughput to 30,000 TPS, solidifying ZKsync’s status as a strong rival to Arbitrum, which previously held a significant share of Ethereum’s Layer 2 total value locked (TVL). ZKsync’s roadmap, featuring innovations like gasless transactions and a Single Sign-On toolkit, lowers barriers for both individual and institutional users, making it an appealing choice for developers and businesses alike.
Institutional Integration: Deutsche Bank and Sony Lead the Way
ZKsync’s credibility among major institutions has grown rapidly, highlighted by collaborations such as Deutsche Bank’s Project Dama 2 and Sony’s adoption of ZK-based solutions. Deutsche Bank’s DAMA 2 platform, built on ZKsync’s ZK Chain, demonstrates how established financial institutions are embracing blockchain. Its three-tiered structure—combining Ethereum’s base layer, a privacy-focused ZK rollup, and an accessible user interface—enables the creation of tokenized funds, hybrid asset management, and compliance with regulatory standards. This initiative, part of Singapore’s Project Guardian, aims to tokenize real-world assets while equipping regulators with tools to oversee and mitigate risks, such as interactions with sanctioned entities.
Sony’s use of ZKsync for enhancing supply chain transparency and verifying NFTs showcases the platform’s versatility beyond decentralized finance. Leveraging ZKsync’s post-Atlas 43,000 TPS capacity, Sony has optimized its internal processes and, in partnership with Bastion, introduced a USD-backed stablecoin for broader retail applications. These cases highlight ZKsync’s ability to meet enterprise demands for compliance, scalability, and data privacy.
Comparing ZKsync and Arbitrum: Performance and Ecosystem Growth
Although Arbitrum currently leads in developer adoption and ecosystem size, ZKsync is rapidly closing the gap with its technical achievements and institutional support. Arbitrum’s fast block times and support for multiple programming languages make it attractive for infrastructure developers. However, ZKsync’s Atlas and Airbender Prover upgrades have delivered sub-500ms transaction speeds and a throughput of 43,000 TPS, surpassing Arbitrum’s scalability milestones.
Institutional engagement further distinguishes the two platforms. While Arbitrum’s Layer 2 ecosystem experienced significant growth in 2025, ZKsync attracted $15 billion in institutional capital, driven by its deflationary token model and integration of real-world assets. With 12 billion transactions processed and $1.9 billion in RWA TVL, ZKsync is expanding its influence in tokenized assets and cross-chain liquidity solutions.
Expanding Use Cases: Beyond Decentralized Finance
ZKsync’s reach extends into areas such as gaming, identity management, and micropayments. Payment companies are utilizing ZKsync’s Layer 2 infrastructure to process millions of small transactions in emerging markets, while gaming platforms benefit from its rapid finality for smoother user experiences. Deutsche Bank’s DAMA 2 also illustrates ZKsync’s role in asset tokenization, with plans to introduce tokenized funds and stablecoins in 2026.
Obstacles and Future Prospects
Despite its rapid progress, ZKsync faces challenges, including competition from Arbitrum and the unpredictability of the broader crypto market. Nevertheless, ongoing upgrades like Fusaka, strong institutional partnerships, and alignment with Ethereum’s long-term goals position ZKsync to capture a larger share of Ethereum’s TVL. The ZKsync DAO’s staking initiative, allocating 37.5 million $ZK tokens, is designed to further decentralize the network and manage market pressures, enhancing its attractiveness to investors.
Conclusion: ZKsync’s Strategic Role in Ethereum’s Growth
With Vitalik Buterin’s endorsement, ZKsync is more than just a technical enhancement—it represents a strategic evolution for Ethereum. By tackling scalability, privacy, and institutional adoption, ZKsync is reshaping Ethereum’s value proposition, enabling seamless movement of assets between Layer 1 and Layer 2, and supporting the integration of real-world assets. For investors, ZKsync’s deflationary tokenomics, practical applications, and alignment with Ethereum’s vision make it a compelling choice for long-term growth.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Zcash Halving and Its Influence on the Dynamics of the Cryptocurrency Market
- Zcash's 2025 halving reduced block rewards by 50%, triggering a 950% price surge to $344.32 by October 2025. - Institutional adoption grew via Grayscale Zcash Trust ($196.8M AUM) and Reliance Global Group's treasury shift, mirroring Bitcoin's institutional trajectory. - Privacy-compliance innovations like ZIP 1015 and optional viewing keys enabled Zcash to align with EU MiCA and U.S. AML regulations while maintaining privacy features. - Post-halving volatility (e.g., $736.32 to $25.96 in early 2026) high

The ICP Network's Rapid Expansion: Could This Transform the Landscape of Decentralized Web Infrastructure?
- ICP's growth stems from protocol upgrades like Chain Fusion and Caffeine AI, enhancing cross-chain interoperability and developer engagement. - Institutional partnerships with Azure and Google Cloud boost credibility, though $1.14B TVL contrasts with inflated $237B adoption claims. - Token volatility sees 2025 prices swing from $9.50 to $3.50, with analysts projecting $4.4–$20.2 ranges by 2030. - ICP challenges AWS/Ethereum with hybrid cloud/decentralized models but faces adoption hurdles against entrenc

Zcash Halving Event: Deflationary Driver or Merely Speculative Hype?
- Zcash's 2025 halving reduces block rewards by 50%, marking its third supply contraction amid conflicting 2025/2028 date debates. - ZEC surged 950% post-halving as ZIP 1015 lockbox mechanism reduced liquidity, attracting institutional buyers like Grayscale and Cypherpunk Technologies . - Miners face income cuts but benefit from price gains; ZIP 1015's liquidity control creates deflationary pressure while raising security concerns. - The event presents both strategic value (privacy-centric scarcity model)
