Trump’s EPA intends to disregard the impact of air pollution on public health

How the EPA Values Human Life in Pollution Policy

Since the Reagan era, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has placed a monetary value on human life. While this may seem unsettling, the intention was to enable cost-benefit analyses for pollution regulations. By quantifying the benefits of reducing pollution in terms of extended lifespans, policymakers could economically justify stricter controls if the health advantages outweighed the expenses.

Every presidential administration since then has continued to assign a financial worth to human life when crafting air quality regulations.

Potential Shift in EPA Policy

According to a New York Times article, the Trump administration is considering abandoning this longstanding practice. If implemented, the EPA would stop factoring in the value of human health when setting rules for ozone and fine particulate matter pollution.

The Dangers of Air Pollution

The harmful effects of air pollution have been recognized for many years, which was a driving force behind the EPA’s creation under President Nixon.

Both ozone and fine particulate matter—commonly referred to as PM2.5—are well known for their links to cardiovascular conditions such as asthma, heart disease, and emphysema.

Ozone in the upper atmosphere shields us from ultraviolet rays. However, when ozone forms at ground level—often due to nitrogen oxides released by vehicles and power plants—it contributes to smog, which can be especially hazardous for at-risk groups during high pollution days.

PM2.5 is even more insidious. Recent studies have associated these tiny particles with a wide array of health problems, including Parkinson’s disease, kidney disorders, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and type 2 diabetes. Even newborns are at risk, as maternal exposure to PM2.5 has been linked to low birth weight. Globally, exposure to fine particulate matter is responsible for as many as 10 million deaths each year.

Industry and Policy Reactions

This proposed regulatory change comes as data centers increasingly depend on less environmentally friendly energy sources. For instance, Elon Musk’s xAI reportedly operated numerous unauthorized natural gas turbines to supply power to its Colossus data center near Memphis, Tennessee—an area already labeled an “asthma capital” by the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America due to high levels of industrial and transportation pollution.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has expressed support for the Trump administration’s approach. “We value the administration’s efforts to bring more practical balance to regulations. We anticipate reviewing the EPA’s proposal,” said Mary Durbin, president of the chamber’s Global Energy Institute, in a statement to the New York Times.

Upcoming Event: Disrupt 2026

Be among the first to secure your spot at Disrupt 2026 in San Francisco, happening October 13-15, 2026. Join the waitlist for early access to tickets. Previous Disrupt events have featured industry giants like Google Cloud, Netflix, Microsoft, Box, Phia, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Hugging Face, Elad Gil, and Vinod Khosla, with over 250 leaders and 200+ sessions designed to accelerate your growth and innovation. Plus, connect with hundreds of startups from every sector.

• Location: San Francisco
• Dates: October 13-15, 2026

Join the Waitlist Now