Banks vs. Stablecoins: Deep Inside The Crypto Bill That Blew Up Washington

Crypto YouTuber and market commentator Crypto Sensei spent his latest video dissecting why the much-hyped U.S. “Clarity Act” for digital assets was suddenly yanked from a key Senate Banking Committee markup — and why much of the industry is now calling it less “clarity” and more “protectionism.”

The immediate trigger: Brian Armstrong publicly withdrew support for the bill hours after seeing the draft text, calling it “materially worse than the current status quo.” That move, according to reporting featured in the video, was the final straw before Chairman Tim Scott postponed the committee vote.

Coinbase Breaks Ranks, Bill Stalls

Armstrong told reporters on Capitol Hill that Coinbase only received the 270‑page draft Monday night and, within 36 hours, flagged provisions he said “would have been catastrophic…for the average American consumer” if pushed through committee and then fixed later.

His concerns, as outlined in the video:

• Heavy restrictions on rewards and yield for users of exchanges like Coinbase
• Reduced regulatory authority for the CFTC over normal crypto currency markets
• Language that would effectively prevent the SEC from enabling tokenization of RWAs

Despite that, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, speaking from a conference in Switzerland, said he was “surprised how vehemently” Coinbase opposed the bill, noting that “the rest of the industry really is still leaning in and supporting it” at least in a negotiated form.

Stablecoin Yield In Center of a $6.6 Trillion Fight

The video leans heavily on outside analysis arguing that banks see the bill as a shield against stablecoin competition.

One cited thread claims 53 banking associations effectively “wrote themselves a $6.6 trillion protection bill,” pointing to Section 404, which would prohibit yield payments on stablecoins “through any mechanism” — not just from issuers, but also exchanges, affiliates, or partners.

The core tension:

• Banks in the United States Of America often pay around 0.01% on deposits
• Stablecoin reserves typically sit in short‑term Treasuries yielding about 4–5%
• If that spread is shared with users, deposits could migrate out of traditional banks

The Kansas City Fed, cited in the video, estimated that competitive stablecoin yields could pull roughly 25.9% of bank deposits — about $1.5 trillion — out of the banking system, slashing lending capacity and threatening community banks. Bank CEOs on recent earnings calls, including JPMorgan and Bank of America, have been explicit: a “parallel banking system that pays interest” via stablecoins is viewed as a systemic risk, not just a new product.

Privacy Fears & a Flurry Of “Dragnet” Provisions

Beyond yield, the host highlights what critics describe as sweeping surveillance powers baked into the current text.

Commentator Paul Barron, quoted extensively, characterizes the Clarity Act as a “dragnet,” pointing to provisions for:

• Warrant-less, real‑time monitoring of transactions
• Extended Bank Secrecy Act rules to non‑custodial wallets
• New Treasury “special measures” that could freeze assets
• Mandated data‑sharing with top foreign central banks

For DeFi users, that could mean significant tracking of wallet activity and reduced privacy. The host argues this would hit retail users hardest, especially those using non‑custodial wallets or decentralized protocols.

Lawmakers Say ‘Progress’, But Industry Sees Capture

Senators Tim Scott, Cynthia Lummis, and Bill Hagerty all issued statements insisting negotiations are ongoing and “everyone remains at the table,” with Scott calling the pause a “brief” one and Hagerty expressing confidence a consensus bill is close.

But reaction across crypto Twitter, as presented in the video, is overwhelmingly negative. Several analysts liken the proposal to a Dodd‑Frank for digital assets, accusing banks of regulatory capture and warning that banning stablecoin yield while China experiments with interest‑bearing e-CNY is a strategic mistake.

For now, the bill’s fate is uncertain. The video notes that even if a revised draft clears committee soon, combining it with other measures, reconciling with the House, and passing both chambers would take months — time the current Congress may not have.

For crypto investors, the key signal is clear enough: Washington is no longer just debating whether to regulate crypto, but who gets to offer yield and who controls the future of tokenized finance. The outcome will determine whether stablecoin returns stay in the banking system or move to on‑chain rails — or are regulated out of reach.

Delve into DailyCoin’s top crypto scoops today:
Bitcoin Breaks $94K as Long-Term Holders Refuse to Sell
Cardano Flashes Rare Cup ‘n’ Handle Pattern: $0.51 Next?

People Also Ask: